October 14, 2013

Letters to the editor: Slap on wrist falls short for Biddeford

Biddeford schools should know better, and Maine ACLU should come down harder

I was shocked to read your account of the Biddeford schools (“Schools in Biddeford asked to apologize,” Oct. 5) permitting the organization Life Choices to speak to their students about Columbine and abstinence as a pretext for preaching to them about “Jesus Christ our Lord and Savior” and “being killed for Christ.”

A reader wonders if Biddeford school officials realize that not everybody practices a Christ-centered religion.


As a Christian, I object. Did it not occur to school officials that not everybody in our country practices a Christ-centered religion? Were any Jewish students there, forced to sit and listen to the proselytizing?

But I am just as shocked that the local American Civil Liberties Union, an organization I have worked for elsewhere, believes that only an apology is needed to see that this sort of flagrant violation of our Constitution does not happen again.

Why has the ACLU not gone directly to the courts to prosecute this blatant violation of the Constitution so that it might not happen again in our state?

Robert L. Hobbs


Michaud strongly endorsed by this disabled veteran

I am a disabled combat veteran who served in Iraq and Afghanistan.

After graduating from Deering High School, I enlisted in the Army and became a member of the 82nd Airborne Division. While serving, I sustained a traumatic brain injury. I am now deaf in one ear and suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder.

I am worried about how the government shutdown will impact my life. Perhaps more worrisome, however, is that I see veterans being used as pawns as the shutdown drags on.

Rather than focusing on ending the government shutdown they caused, Republican leaders are focused on using men and women like myself, to score points against the Democrats in order to win the PR war.

That’s not why I fought for this country. That’s not the treatment veterans deserve.

Just last week, Republicans in Congress forced a vote on the House floor they claimed would have funded the Department of Veterans Affairs. In reality, it shortchanged the VA by $6 billion by cutting essential services, including medical and prosthetic research, cemetery administration, grants to state VA homes and much more.

Fortunately, leaders like Rep. Mike Michaud voted against the bill and called the Republicans out for their actions.

Now, Rep. Michaud is being attacked by the Maine GOP and Gov. Paul Le-Page. They are questioning his leadership and trying to mislead veterans into thinking he voted against us.

As a combat veteran and lifelong Mainer, I want to set the record straight.

Rep. Michaud stands with American veterans, and no misleading attack from the GOP is going to convince me or anyone else otherwise.

For more than a decade he’s fought to ensure that veterans get the care and respect they deserve.

Perhaps instead of questioning Rep. Michaud’s leadership on veterans’ issues, the Republican Party should be questioning its own.

Timothy Valliere

Michaud gubernatorial campaign volunteer


Democrats show hypocrisy in defending Obamacare

When Republicans try to make any changes to Obamacare, Democrats argue that Obamacare became “the law of the land” in 2010 when Obama signed it into law after the Democrats (and only the Democrats) passed the bill called the Affordable Health Care Act.

However, since 2010, Obama himself has unilaterally made changes to his own bill with carve-outs, exemptions (including Congress – unbelievable!), delays, etc. Beside the fact that Obama does not have the authority to change “the law of the land” on his own, I’m even more concerned that all of these changes have added tremendously to the cost of Obamacare.

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors

Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)