December 9, 2013

Letters to the editor: Michaud should join gun bill sponsors

Readers also share thoughts on Iran sanctions, movement of the DHHS office and free speech for the tea party.

Dec. 14 will mark the one-year anniversary of the tragic shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School. Since that time, Congress has failed to take any action to strengthen our gun laws.

click image to enlarge

A school bus drives past a sign in Newtown, Conn., site of the 2012 school shooting that took 26 lives. A reader urges Rep. Mike Michaud to take a firm stand on background checks for gun sales.

The Associated Press

Despite overwhelming public support, the Toomey-Manchin bill requiring background checks on private gun sales has stalled in the Senate. Eighty-nine percent of Mainers think there should be background checks on all gun sales.

Sens. Susan Collins and Angus King are both still strong supporters of the background check bill. They both voted in favor of the bill when it came before the Senate in April and have said they will vote “yes” on the bill when it comes up again. Rep. Chellie Pingree was an early co-sponsor of H.R. 1565, the House version of Toomey-Manchin.

Rep. Mike Michaud is the only member of the Maine congressional delegation who has not taken a definitive stand on background checks. He says that he supports background checks and would vote for Toomey-Manchin when it comes to the House floor, yet he refuses to co-sponsor H.R. 1565.

There is nothing in Michaud’s voting record to indicate that he truly supports background checks. During his years in Congress, he has consistently voted with the National Rifle Association and has earned an A-minus rating from the organization. It should be noted that the NRA opposes Toomey-Manchin.

Rep. Michaud needs to add his name to the 186 co-sponsors already on H.R. 1565 and help move the bill forward. He should understand what powerful symbolism there is in having an NRA A-minus-rated congressman co-sponsor a bill requiring background checks on gun purchasers.

Now is not the time for silence and inaction.

Cathie Whittenburg

consultant, States United to Prevent Gun Violence


Maintaining Iran sanctions key to nuclear, peace issues

I have read Ed McCarthy’s Dec. 2 Maine Voices column, “Reflexive support of Israel should not derail Middle East peace efforts.”

Mr. McCarthy’s piece contains many complaints about Israel and U.S. support for Israel, but it is aimed most directly and negatively at Congress and Sen. Susan Collins. He admonishes Sen. Collins and others not to interfere with the administration’s peace-making efforts by supporting or adopting additional sanctions on Iran.

I share Mr. McCarthy’s desire to deny Iran access to nuclear weapons by diplomatic means, and I applaud the progress the administration has recently made in this regard. Mr. McCarthy chooses to ignore or downplay, however, the fact that the diplomatic process has made progress solely because of the sting of harsh sanctions.

The leaders of Iran have not finally come to the negotiating table because they want to be our ally or because they no longer despise the very existence of Israel. The leaders of Iran are talking to us because it is in their own self-interest to have the sanctions lifted. We should applaud the actions of successive U.S. administrations and the U.S. Congress, including Sen. Collins, in approving, implementing and showing worldwide leadership with respect to these sanctions.

Moreover, the leadership of Iran must understand that if it fails to use the six-month window to reach a comprehensive settlement that assures the world that Iran cannot and will not seek to develop nuclear weapons, harsher and more painful sanctions will ensue.

By keeping the pressure on Iran, the U.S. Congress will continue to create the conditions that can lead to a peaceful resolution of the crisis caused by Iran’s rush toward development of a nuclear weapon. The alternatives to a diplomatic solution are awful to contemplate. We should thank Sen. Collins for her continued steadfastness in supporting sanctions against Iran.

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors

Further Discussion

Here at we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)