October 23, 2013

Our View: Rifle-carrying man displayed poor judgment

Whatever Carlos Reed’s intent, his openly toting a gun around Portland put police in a perilous situation.

Carlos Reed says he was exercising his Second Amendment rights. But he’s accused of the “threatening display of a weapon” for walking around Portland carrying an assault rifle, allegedly in a position in which it can be rapidly aimed.

click image to enlarge

Barrels of AR-15 assault rifles are seen at Stag Arms, a gunmaker in New Britain, Conn., in an April file photo. Carlos Reed is accused of the “threatening display of a weapon” for walking around Portland carrying a Del Ton AR-15 assault rifle, allegedly in a position in which it can be rapidly aimed.

2013 File Photo/The Associated Press

Whatever Reed intended to do, this is an example of irresponsible gun ownership that places law enforcement officials in a difficult situation. Reed says he’s dismayed that police have warned the public about him, and he believes the incident has been blown out of proportion. Given the circumstances, though, police acted responsibly, and they deserve credit for their restraint.

Reed hasn’t disputed that he was out at night with an assault rifle in plain sight – and he has no reason to, because it’s legal in Maine to carry a gun openly without a permit or license.

The Iraq war veteran and college law enforcement student also has said that he was carrying his rifle pointed at the ground because he’d been taught that that was safe. But police and prosecutors allege that the “low ready” position of Reed’s rifle would allow him to “pop that weapon up and target it very rapidly,” as Portland Police Chief Michael Sauschuck has put it.

It’s all in the context. If Reed had been walking in the woods during deer season carrying a hunting rifle, he would have been an expected sight in that setting. Considering that he was walking along a city street at 1 a.m. carrying an assault rifle, it’s not surprising that someone was concerned enough to call 911 or that city police stopped him and ordered him to put down his rifle.

And police confiscated Reed’s rifle and a handgun strapped to his ankle not because he was practicing open carry, but because of public complaints and because the position of the assault rifle appeared to be a violation of the law.

When police get a report that someone with a gun is in a public place, they must respond in a way that takes into account both that person’s liberty and law enforcement’s responsibility to ensure public safety. In this case, from what we know so far, local police have fulfilled that obligation – thus carrying out a very delicate balancing act.

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors

Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)