I am writing in response to the article posted Nov. 19 (“In court, Portland defends panhandling limits”), discussing the prohibition of panhandling by the city of Portland. It is frustrating to see the number of complaints about panhandling when the real issue is being overlooked.
Why do the residents of Portland think people are panhandling? I believe it is because of the lack of resources for mental health within the city that limits whether individuals’ needs and housing capabilities can be addressed.
The city of Portland should be coming together within the public forum to discuss ways to help individuals. There needs to be more commentary regarding why these individuals feel the need to panhandle instead of banning panhandling.
People deserve to be treated fairly, and by prohibiting panhandling, it may cause people to lose their only income for necessities. If the public wants a say in city laws, then let them be aware of what society needs to provide in order for individuals to feel safe enough to receive the support that they need.
Elizabeth Hahnel
New Gloucester
Send questions/comments to the editors.
Success. Please wait for the page to reload. If the page does not reload within 5 seconds, please refresh the page.
Enter your email and password to access comments.
Hi, to comment on stories you must . This profile is in addition to your subscription and website login.
Already have a commenting profile? .
Invalid username/password.
Please check your email to confirm and complete your registration.
Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.
Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.