April 8, 2012

An argument that holds water

Portland's waterfront today is as much a subject for debate over usage as it was more than a century ago, when Longfellow wrote of 'the beauty and mysteries of the ships.'

By JOHN F. BAUMAN/Special to The Maine Sunday Telegram

Portland's waterfront has long been viewed as contested urban space. In the 1830s and 1840s it boomed. Shipbuilding thrived, and thanks to entrepreneurs like John Bundy Brown, Portland boasted a brisk coastwise trade with the West Indies and Carolinas.

click image to enlarge

Visions for the Portland waterfront have differed since the days of trade with the West Indies. Today it’s the “working waterfront” concept versus mixed residential, recreation and tourism.

Courtesy of Earle Shettleworth

click image to enlarge

Courtesy of Earle Shettleworth

Additional Photos Below

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

John F. Bauman is a visiting research professor of planning, development and environment at the Muskie School of Public Service at the University of Southern Maine. He is the author of “Gateway to Vacationland: The Making of Portland, Maine,” published by the University of Massachusetts Press.

Longfellow memorialized this era in his poem "My Lost Youth" where he spoke not only of the "beautiful town seated by the sea," but also of the "wharves and the slips, and Spanish sailors with bearded lips and the beauty and mysteries of the ships."

By the Civil War the romance vanished. In the 1840s businessman John Poor unfurled his vision of Portland as a railroad hub with an economy built on handling cargoes of Canadian winter wheat shipped by rail from Montreal during those frigid months when the St. Lawrence froze. Portland paved over the old Fore Street wharves, creating the 100-foot-wide, 6,000-foot-long Commercial Street, and in order to build the locomotives and railcars for the new Atlantic and St. Lawrence Railroad (later Grand Trunk), Poor founded the Portland Company.

This kind of combat between visions for the Portland waterfront still drives debate, as fishing boats and processing operations battle for space with the creeping growth of offices, shops and restaurants. This may look like a modern conflict, but the city's history shows it is nothing new. For more than a century Portland's waterfront has been in a process of revision and rebirth that carries on through to today.

After the Civil War and the July 4, 1866, fire that consumed three-fourths of the city, Portland reveled in its role as a Canadian grain port and increasingly abjured industrialism, making Longfellow's "city by the sea" more its brand than the poet's wharves and slips. J.B. Brown abandoned sugar-making for real estate, and now hotels like the Falmouth and the Ottawa House made Portland the "Gateway to Vacationland."

Portland embraced tourism, turning Deering Oaks into an idyllic pleasure ground and the banks of the once polluted Back Cove into parkland. But, the waterfront, once the heart of the city's maritime economy, witnessed less and less commerce. Between 1880 and 1900 the size of Portland's fleet decreased by half. The city's great fear that its maritime economy was dying gained traction in 1923, when Canada shifted its wintertime grain commerce from Portland to Halifax and St. Johns, New Brunswick.

Although the needs of Maine's paper industry for china clay and the laying of an oil pipeline between Portland and Montreal kept the port active in the 1920s, it languished again during the Great Depression. By World War II, Commercial Street and the Old Port looked haggard. Although the war revived shipbuilding and Portland hosted the North Atlantic destroyer fleet, the war-born revival faded after 1945.

The destruction in 1961 of the Union Station gave birth in 1964 to Greater Portland Landmarks, which in the 1970s worked along with Frank Akers of the Old Port Exchange to revive the city's historic Old Port as a tourist attraction. Meanwhile, the waterfront languished. A 1969 report, "Port of Portland, Maine, Development Plan" urged transforming the pier complex into mixed residential, recreational and tourism uses. Two years later the Evening Express branded 36 percent of the waterfront buildings "dilapidated," and 11 of the 34 piers "substandard."

Mounting concern for the port's sustainability led to a 1973 national City Edges grant that funded the 1975 waterfront plan, recommending "mixed" residential, retail, recreational and commercial uses, including a city-owned fish pier and a loading dock for container ships.

City Edges aside, many adamantly championed a strictly "working waterfront." The two visions -- a festive waterfront for hotels, housing, parks, museums, aquariums, etc., versus a "working waterfront" -- clashed in the 1980s, especially after condominiums blanketed Chandlers Wharf. The debate ended in a March 1987 referendum where two to one, Portlanders approved an ordinance allowing only "marine-related" development on the waterfront.

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors


Additional Photos

click image to enlarge

Courtesy of Earle Shettleworth

  


Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)