February 23, 2012

Maine Voices: Can a major Democratic contributor be an unbiased newspaper investor?

There are three groups that ought to be worried about Donald Sussman's investment in MaineToday Media.

Roger Katz is a Republican state senator from Augusta.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Roger Katz is a Republican state senator from Augusta.

If the New York Yankees subsidized the salaries of umpires calling games against the Red Sox, people would be screaming from Eastport to Block Island.

If a lawyer loaned a judge money just before a trial before that same judge, we all would be appalled.

We expect umpires and judges to "call 'em as they see 'em."

The integrity of baseball and our judicial system depends on it.

Then why is it all right for Donald Sussman, husband of Congresswoman Chelle Pingree, to invest money in The Portland Press Herald, Kennebec Journal and Morning Sentinel, become a part-owner and take a seat on the board?

I have never met Donald Sussman.

A reputed billionaire who made his fortune on Wall Street, he is, by all accounts, a good man. His charitable generosity is legendary. I think I would like him. He probably even owns a couple of dogs (giving him extra points in my book).

But here's the rub: Sussman is the largest contributor to the Democratic Party and related liberal/progressive causes in our state's history, paying millions over the last few years.

His wife is running for re-election to Congress and his stepdaughter, Hannah Pingree, former speaker of the Maine House, may have legitimate future political aspirations of her own.

Mr. Sussman assures us there is no reason for concern.

He is simply being a good citizen, infusing millions into a newspaper business in financial crisis.

He will not exercise any influence over the reporting of the news or the editorial policy of the newspapers he now partly owns.

Not to worry, he tells us.

But despite his assurances, there is danger on the horizon having little to do with Mr. Sussman's particular political views. The same dilemma would exist if one of the far-right Koch brothers moved to town and decided to buy in. We should all be concerned, wherever we fit on the political spectrum.

There are three groups who should be worried.

First, the editors. If Mr. Sussman decides to give substantial funds to support the campaign for gay marriage, what will the editors do? Support him in print and look like they have been co-opted? Oppose him and worry about a pink slip? What about his wife's re-election campaign? What if they decide her opponent is better qualified? They are damned if they do and damned if they don't. One thing is certain: The editorial writers will constantly be in a tough place, and I wish them well with their sleepless nights.

The second group who should be nervous are reporters. I find that the current writers try their very best to be fair, objective and unbiased.

But what happens if damaging information were to surface about Mr. Sussman, his wife or the political organizations he so lavishly supports? Will they feel free to aggressively pursue those leads, knowing the resulting stories may cast their boss in an unfavorable light? And if they do, how will Mr. Sussman react? These reporters are people, too, with mortgages, car payments and kids to support. How unfair to them to be put in this position.

The final group that should be worried is us, the readers. The public already has little confidence in "the media," who are right down there with lawyers and politicians (my two jobs!) at the bottom of the trust-o-meter. If we take the things we read in the paper now with a grain of salt, we will be choking on chunks tomorrow, always wondering if a news report, an investigative piece or an editorial position might be colored by the 800-pound gorilla in the boardroom.

Mr. Sussman could have made us all breathe easier if he had just made an outright loan to the papers instead of insisting on an ownership stake and a seat on the board.

But he did not. Why?

This issue is not unique to Maine.

In Philadelphia, former Gov. Ed Rendell is fronting a group attempting to buy the Philadelphia Inquirer, and these same concerns are being raised there.

The head of the union representing 400 newspaper employees worries about the continued journalistic integrity of the paper, pointing out: "Without that (integrity), nobody will want to read the papers. We won't have jobs."

Mr. Sussman's investment may be a positive development for the newspapers' balance sheet, and that is good.

But I worry it is a sad day for those of us who wake up every morning, go to the door and want to pick up an unbiased source of news to read with our morning coffee. 

- Special to MaineToday Media

 

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors




Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)