February 21

Another View: Editorial offers no good reason for keeping Maine potatoes off WIC list

Our congressional delegation is on solid ground in standing up for the nutrient-rich vegetable.

By Steve Crane

I am disappointed in your editorial opposing the Maine congressional delegation’s efforts to reverse the ban on fresh potatoes in the WIC program (“Our View: Don’t change WIC list for Maine potato farmers,” Jan. 28).


Steve Crane is owner of Crane Brothers Inc., a family-run potato farm in Exeter.

As a former president of the National Potato Council and owner of a family-run potato farm in Exeter, I am very concerned that the federal government is telling the public that potatoes are unhealthy and deserve to be left out of a major nutrition program.

Oversight of WIC is very much within the authority of our elected representatives in Congress, many of whom understand there is no scientific basis for keeping nutritionally rich potatoes out of the program.

In 2007, the U.S. Department of Agriculture revised the Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children to make all fresh fruits and vegetables eligible for purchase with WIC vouchers. That is, every item in the produce aisle except for fresh potatoes.

Your editorial argues that nutrition policy should be left up to the nutrition scientists. Well, let’s see what the nutritionists say: The USDA’s 2010 Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommend that women eat 5 cups of starchy vegetables per week, and that children up to age 5 eat up to 4 cups of starchy vegetables per week.

According to the most recent government data, women are eating half as many starchy vegetables as recommended by the federal government, and young children are coming up short as well.

The USDA based its potato ban on a 2005 Institute of Medicine report, outdated nutritional guidelines and consumption data from the mid-1990s. With most Americans underconsuming fresh fruits and vegetables, the USDA should focus on reversing that trend instead of relying on old data and obsolete recommendations to rationalize a ban on nutrient-rich potatoes.

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors

Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)