March 13, 2013

Another View: DNA sampling not only solves but also can prevent crimes


Your March 4 editorial regarding DNA samples (

"Our View: DNA samples should not be routine at arrest"

) leaves a lot to be desired when it comes to talking about police responsibility.

I am a retired police officer (27 years with the Syracuse, N.Y., Police Department).

Police are in charge not only of arresting offenders but also of preventing crimes.

Fingerprinting is done at arrest, not after convictions. It is done not only to positively identify the person but also to learn if they are wanted in another jurisdiction.

An experience I had that highlights this procedure happened when I fingerprinted a defendant for a very minor gambling charge and discovered through the FBI wanted system that he was wanted for murder in another state.

Police need all the help they can get, and tying their hands will not promote the safety of the public.

Victor G. McNett is a resident of Topsham.


Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors

Further Discussion

Here at we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)