Thursday, December 5, 2013
Fifty years ago, Martin Luther King Jr. had a dream that one day, a people long denied their rights would become full citizens of our nation.
A woman carries a sign depicting the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. during an event Saturday at the Lincoln Memorial to mark the 1963 March on Washington. Citing King’s “I have a dream” speech, a reader says his own image of a better America includes a criminal justice system that is focused on restoration.
2013 File Photo/The Associated Press
Today, I have a dream -- a dream for Maine and our nation.
I have a dream that one day everyone, even those who fall and harm others, will be treated with dignity and respect and given a second chance to take responsibility for their actions, make restitution to those whom they have harmed, seek rehabilitation and become productive citizens.
I have a dream that the needs of victims will become a crucial concern of our justice system and that the resources needed for their support and healing will be made available.
I have a dream that we will allocate more resources to crime prevention than to retribution and that our return on investment will not be measured in short-term dollars but in the long-term reweaving of our frayed social fabric.
I have a dream that all children will be taught in the ways of restorative practices and that their education will include sowing seeds of peace and reconciliation.
I have a dream that our prisons and jails will no longer serve as society's primary mental health and substance abuse facilities, but will be reserved for those few who are truly a danger to society or themselves and provide a full range of rehabilitative resources to reduce recidivism.
I have a dream -- a dream that across our state and nation, citizens, professionals and politicians will join together to transform our culture of punishment into one of prevention, healing and restoration.
The Rev. T. Richard Snyder, Ph.D.
Column overlooks earlier alternatives in hip surgery
I enjoyed the Maine Voices column by Andy Young about recovering from his hip surgery ("Gratitude grows stronger during recovery from hip surgery," Aug. 9), and I wish him full recovery soon. My own total hip was done more than five years ago, and is perfect.
I do not agree with his statement that "Had I been born 30 years earlier and subsequently been saddled with an arthritic hip, my only options would have been to gulp aspirin tablets and limp ..."
As an orthopedic resident at Massachusetts General Hospital from 1959 to 1961, I and the other residents helped Drs. Marius Smith-Petersen, Otto Aufranc, Drennan Lowell and William Harris in 10 to 12 "cup arthroplasties" a day. This arthroplasty was a forerunner of the modern "total hip" and was very helpful to thousands.
In 1967, when I started practice in Portland, Mercy Hospital bought the necessary specialized equipment for cup arthroplasties, and many folks were helped. Results generally were good but not as good as modern total hips done today.
Lawrence Crane, M.D., soon obtained permission to cement in a newer Charnley hip with improved results. Forty years ago, I visited John Charnley (the father of modern hip surgery) in England, and this became the accepted and generally very successful type of hip surgery.
There have been steady improvements so that now, instead of being in the hospital for weeks, the patient is discharged anywhere from the day of surgery to two to three days later, and the results are excellent.
However, believe it or not, back in the 1950s and '60s, we really did have more than aspirin.
Lawrence M. Leonard, M.D.
Scarborough could lose say over casino on Downs land
The Scarborough Town Council voted recently to allow casino gambling on the Scarborough Downs property -- a stone's throw from our children's schools.
By adding casinos as an "approved use" in that area, the council ignored five democratic votes on gambling referendums and our 2006 comprehensive plan. Each time Scarborough voters were asked whether they wanted a casino, we said "no" (twice on local referendums, thrice on state referendums).
Of course, the council will tell you that a casino is only allowed if the voters say "OK" to casino gambling in a new referendum. After all, we've already voted five times against it. Who knows -- we may vote for it someday. For now, that fact may be true. But it sure does put the cart before the horse, don't you think?
What the council didn't say -- and in fairness, maybe doesn't know -- is that Scarborough Downs and its gambling interests initiated legislation at the state level through different legislators (not ours).
One of the proposed laws bypasses a local referendum. The state legislation didn't get voted on this session, but it could go through next session.
If the state Legislature votes to eliminate the requirement for a town to approve the casino, it will be the state voters, not the taxpayers of Scarborough, who will determine whether the Downs can put a casino on its property. Think it can't happen? The governor sets the standards for behavior. Think again.
These types of votes always happen in the middle of the night, or in the middle of August. Neither the Planning Board nor the Long Range Planning Committee had any input into the zoning amendment. For more information, contact the No Again group on Facebook or email email@example.com.
The council can reconsider its amendment at its next meeting, but that's our last shot before it could become a state issue. That's the game that casino operators and the Downs have set up. You ready to play?
Suzanne A. Foley-Ferguson
former town councilor
Decaying roads, bridges cost Maine motorists a lot
We all know that our transportation system is vital to our economy in several ways: one, transporting our goods, traveling to work and school; second, providing jobs to maintain the system.
But we are facing a dilemma. Our transportation infrastructure is decrepit.
Here are the statistics: nationally, total bridges: 604,995. Total deficient: 66,405, or 11 percent as of 2011. In Maine, we have approximately 2,400 bridges; of those, 356, or 14 percent, are classified as deficient.
The nearly 38 percent of Maine roads that are in need of repair right now cost Maine motorists $246 million a year in extra car repairs and operating expenses. That pares down to $245 per motorist. And there are thousands of miles of roads across the country that are in disrepair.
We must do more to increase funding for bridge and road repairs. In turn, it would increase job growth and strengthen our economy.