Monday, April 21, 2014
Thank you for publishing an editorial concerning the efforts by Rep. Chellie Pingree and Sen. Susan Collins to address sexual assault in the military ("Our View: Bills offer right response to military sex abuse crisis," May 20).
Measures that address the military’s handling of sexual assault charges within its ranks could change victims’ lives for the better, a reader says.
2009 File Photo/The Associated Press
Although the editorial was correct in saying that the bills move us in the right direction, I would respectfully disagree that they are "small steps."
The bill that Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand introduced and Sen. Collins supports introduces significant reforms to the military justice system.
Yet Rep. Pingree's bill creates a greater change in the way that veterans who experienced sexual assault receive their benefits.
A similar bill was passed in 2010 that concerned veterans who had served in battle zones. The question then, as now, is the degree of credibility we are willing to give to veterans who report trauma.
The requirement to specifically document combat experience was eliminated on the basis of a reasonable assumption of combat in a war zone. These bills extend the same assumption of credibility to the testimony of victims of sexual assault.
As a Marine combat veteran of Vietnam, I saw first-hand how a change in policy transformed lives. Respectfully, the passage of these bills into law would be a huge step forward.
John M. Flagler
State grades part of effort to promote charter schools
It is interesting to have the LePage administration provide letter grades for schools. It's an effective way to criticize public schools and for our Republican governor to promote the use of charter schools with public funds.
Meanwhile, the Republican Party with its tea party agenda is working to provide public money to private and religious schools, which selectively choose their students. Criticizing public schools, which must accept all students, is a beginning step.
Currently, a number of Republican leaders are touting vouchers aggressively in Congress and in Republican-controlled states. In the U.S. Senate recently, a voucher plan that would have directed millions of taxpayer dollars to religious schools was defeated. Our Maine senators both voted against it.
The Alexander-Paul School Choice Amendment would have allowed $14.5 billion in existing Title I funds to follow low-income children to any accredited school, public or private. Yet the voucher program in the District of Columbia, passed in 2003, has shown no impact on student achievement.
Several Republican governors are strong advocates for providing vouchers with public funds -- Bobby Jindal of Louisiana, Chris Christie of New Jersey, Bill Haslam of Tennessee, Mike Pence of Indiana, Scott Walker of Wisconsin and Rick Scott of Florida.
Vouchers and tuition tax credits would take money away from public schools, and taxpayers would be forced to support the education of a selected few, including those who attend private and religious schools.
What is at stake here? The threat to the funding for public schools and the threat to the separation of church and state.
Education has always been the path to success. Without question, students and teachers do best with smaller classes and support services. Public schools deserve the best of support from our government and citizens.
Trade group doesn't speak for legislator on tar sands
In his letter of May 20 ("City should reject oil sands resolution"), Jamie Py, president of the Maine Energy Marketers Association, presumes that the state legislative committee that deals with environmental matters shares his views.
(Continued on page 2)