November 10, 2012

Letters to the editor
Re-electing Obama shows bad judgment

Today, while I am truly afraid for my country, I am also amazed at the utter stupidity of the American people who would re-elect Barack Obama.

Barack Obama
click image to enlarge

President Obama and his daughter Malia wave toward the crowd at his election night party in Chicago on Wednesday. “A complicit, completely biased liberal media machine” ignored the many examples of the president’s incompetence and pressed for his re-election, a reader says.

2012 File Photo/The Associated Press

click image to enlarge

They have re-elected a man who would stand by and let his own ambassador, along with other Americans, be slaughtered by terrorists and a man who has racked up more debt in four years than any other in history. They have re-elected a man who kowtows to foreign leaders and a man whose administration has virtually abandoned the stranded victims of New York and New Jersey.

The entire list of incompetence, deceit and mismanagement has been ignored by a complicit, completely biased media machine bent on pushing the liberal agenda of their anointed leader. Pathetic.

The next four years will be the most horrific disaster in our country's history. In 2014, when the force-fed Obamacare kicks in, we will see the largest across-the-board tax increases known to man. Small businesses will continue to fail.

It is time to perform a bit of personal economic stimulus and stock up on emergency supplies, food, guns and ammunition because the economic collapse of America is coming. Hunker down and ride out the storm. I hope America survives. I will. Molon Labe.

Michael Frelk


Candidate endorsement violated agency's policy

I am writing to repudiate any connection between the Southern Maine Agency on Aging and a letter to the editor published in the Portland Press Herald on Oct. 13 that was written by Eileen Whynot endorsing a candidate for elected office in Gorham ("More letters to the editor: Readers speak up for, against legislative candidates").

While Ms. Whynot was a staff member of our agency, the contents of her letter represent her personal views. Her letter was written without the knowledge of her superiors and is a violation of long-established agency policy prohibiting the use of the agency's name in any partisan campaign.

The Southern Maine Agency on Aging has not, does not and never will endorse any candidate for public office. Doing so would be a violation of our nonprofit charter. We highly value our reputation as an objective and nonpartisan advocate for older adults and wish to make that point clear to your readers.

Laurence W. Gross

executive director, Southern Maine Agency on Aging


Draw on nation's resources to address nation's needs

As a Sister of Mercy, I help provide care to all who need it, regardless of ability to pay. This should be the credo, not only of religious and charitable organizations, but of the most basic public programs established by government.

And yet, under the state of Maine's recent "austerity" budgets, many needy are being turned away: from Medicaid, educational services, and a range of programs intended to protect our neighbors from poverty, sickness and want. And now, in its efforts to reduce debt, the federal government is contemplating similarly harsh budget choices.

Program budgets should only be cut when there's inadequate revenue to fund them. But the revenue shortfalls we're facing at the state, and now federal levels, are at least partially a matter of choice.

Within Maine and – to a much greater degree, the United States – are extraordinarily wealthy individuals and extremely profitable corporations. The proportion of the tax load paid by these fortunate parties has declined over the decades, even as their wealth and income have grown.

Mainers and Americans tend not to begrudge the success of others, but they do expect everyone to do a fair share for the community. Our federal income tax system must better reflect both our nation's needs and its resources.

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors

Further Discussion

Here at we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)