Wednesday, December 11, 2013
Bill Nemitz's column ("Syrian images hang over peace protest," Sept. 1) about Portland's Saturday peace protest against a U.S. invasion of Syria did not accurately represent the objectives of the march or the views of its participants. (I attended the protest and was quoted in his column.)
Free Syrian Army fighters stand by a damaged bus in Idlib province Wednesday. The evidence produced to support U.S. military action in Syria actually erodes the White House’s case, a reader says.
The Associated Press
Nemitz portrayed Saturday's peace demonstrators buying -- as he does -- Secretary of State John Kerry and President Obama's smoking gun (i.e., the yet-to-be-produced evidence that links Assad to the gassing of innocent Syrians).
The more the evidence gathers, the less credibility the White House has. On Sunday, Kerry held a press conference where he produced a photo of gassed victims. Later, the photographer who took the picture came forth and said it represented Iraqi victims in 2003!
Furthermore, the U.N. inspectors haven't even completed their report. They have yet to determine if Assad or the rebels caused the gassing.
Sunday evening, a Doctors Without Borders report linked the gassing to the rebels.
The Portland peace community is opposed to U.S. military action in Syria because we do not believe it can be a limited war and could lead to a major Middle East conflict involving Iran, Russia and Israel, all of whom possess impressive nuclear arsenals.
Nemitz's concern about the killing of innocent children in Syria is not isolated to Syria.
I would ask him to consider the huge number of innocent children killed by American drones in Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia, along with the Israeli bombings of Palestine and Gaza, where the deaths of children exceed 1,500.
Once again, we have an administration beating the drums of war.
This time it's the Democrats.
In spite of credible doubt that it was Syria's Bashar Assad who ordered chemical weapons be used "on his own people," somehow we are to believe that the only viable response to the incident is for U.S. warships to lob $3 million missiles to destroy the infrastructure of the same, suffering people.
Let's remember, as we've been told over and over again: The U.S. doesn't count civilian deaths that occur from our military assaults.
This time, the situation is different.
In large part due to the last wars that we put on a credit card (remember those tax breaks we gave to the rich?) our communities are suffering.
We are still unemployed, or underemployed, or not earning enough to make a living.
More of us are using food stamps, a program under attack.
The sequester left our 4-year-olds without that life-changing Head Start experience, and our elders wait in vain for their Meals on Wheels.
Our homeless shelters are overflowing. Rather than provide supportive living environments for our mentally ill, these brothers and sisters are dumped into the streets and prisons, leaving their families in anguish.
Portland Press Herald readers are well aware of the problems facing Maine's elders.
The most shocking reality is that we knew this was coming and we did nothing to prepare.
Our social infrastructure has as many potholes, leaking roofs and rusty steel as our roads, schools and bridges.
For decades, regardless of party affiliation, elected officials have offered up the best of our discretionary dollars for military spending.
The result is an elite class that has become uber-rich, endless war abroad and a frayed, insecure populace at home.
Enough! Do not bomb Syria. Bring our war dollars home.
Mary Beth Sullivan
Since the 1950s, the United States has "intervened" in Egypt, Lebanon, Iraq, Iran, Pakistan, Oman, Syria, Yemen, Kuwait and Afghanistan (that is just the Middle East list).
Sometimes it has been all-out war and sometimes it has helped "regime change" or reinstated royalty or helped to put a pro-American government in place.
Sometimes we just have used drones to kill the people we have decided are harmful to us.
Is it any wonder people in the Middle East don't trust us?
How does the Middle East look?
Have our interventions made it look any better?
It is time to stop.
Heavy traffic will drive away would-be visitors to Maine
On Monday, around 6 p.m., a visitor to our state passed through the tollbooths at Kittery having experienced 15 miles of bumper-to-bumper traffic.
No, there was no accident -- unless it was that the Maine Turnpike Authority had accidentally concluded that two E-ZPass lanes and one cash lane would be adequate accommodation for exiting vacationers on one of the busiest travel days of the year.
A great deal of Maine business depends on visitors to our fair state, so if we're to believe that "Maine is open for business," we might want to think about making driving conditions just a little easier for those visitors.
I daresay there may be more than a few who drove south Monday afternoon who, by now, will have crossed their fall leaf-peeping trips right off their calendars.
Press Herald, others ignore impact of Japan meltdown
Why is there no news about, possibly, the greatest calamity in history?
I am talking about the nuclear meltdown in Japan that gets worse and worse as time goes on.
Every tuna caught off California is showing signs of radioactivity; sea lions are washing ashore, and federal officials won't even test them.
The reactor is leaking 400 tons of radioactive water into the Pacific every day! The nuclear power plant's owner, Tepco, has no idea how to stop it. They are now detecting steam infecting the air.
As of now, no fish that comes from the Pacific is safe to eat, and soon, all the other oceans will be infected.
Do the editors of the Portland Press Herald actually think that there is any more important story out there? Or have the collective media just decided that the world is doomed and that there is no point in reporting it?