Saturday, March 8, 2014
(Continued from page 1)
A fisherman holds a pair of elvers in his hand in an April 2012 file photo. Having to enter a drawing to get an elver license is unfair to commercial fishermen, whose livelihood depends on access to the different fisheries, a reader says.
2012 File Photo/Gabe Souza
An estimated one in three women will be sexually assaulted by an intimate partner over the course of her lifetime, and approximately 1 billion women worldwide are abused by a man each year.
Yet, despite the pervasiveness of this violence, rarely do we collectively bear witness and take responsive action.
On Feb. 14, millions of people around the world rallied and danced, demanding an end to discrimination and violence against women and girls.
In Delhi, Hong Kong, Paris, New York, London and thousands of small towns in between, feet stomped and voices rose.
In Portland, a flash mob, rally and march gave way to hours of testimony from victims, advocates and change makers about the essential need to end violence against women -- today.
The intersection of joyful dancing "reclaiming of our right to freedom from violence" -- along with an extensive speak-out about the horror of experiencing violence -- reminded us of the significance of sexual violence in individuals' lives and the resilience of the human spirit.
Most of us are not perpetrators of violence. How do we support the girls and women in our lives, nation and world?
The Violence Against Women Act funds victim services and prevention and education programs, yet reauthorization has stalled in Congress, potentially eliminating vital services.
In January, Maine Sens. Susan Collins and Angus King showed leadership and supported reauthorizing the Violence Against Women Act, which passed the Senate. The bill is expected to have a tough fight in the House.
Raising our collective voices to ensure adequate support for basic services is a small effort that can yield a great gain.
executive director, Boys to Men
Altered benefits calculation would take toll on veterans
A little-understood proposal to cut federal spending would demand sacrifice from our nation's veterans, including those with severe disabilities and elderly survivors of World War II.
The proposal, known as the chained Consumer Price Index, is touted by some in Washington as a more accurate way to compute cost-of-living adjustments to federal benefits than the current inflation index.
Unfortunately, that's not true for older Americans, including many veterans and people with disabilities, whose hard-earned benefits would no longer keep up with inflation if this proposal takes effect.
Even more troubling, permanent adjustments to the cost-of-living index take a bigger bite over time. The effect would be a stealthy and growing benefit cut for the rest of a veteran's life.
In Maine, we have approximately 133,000 veterans.
If the chained CPI proposal goes through, collectively, Maine veterans will lose almost $95 million in benefits over the next decade. Reductions would build up for Social Security benefits, which millions of veterans nationwide depend on.
Under a chained CPI, a retiree who lives to age 92 would actually lose a month's worth of benefits each year.
Budget decisions should be fair, and promises should be kept. Reducing the cost-of-living adjustment by shifting to an improper formula falls short on both counts.
AARP, the American Legion, Disabled American Veterans, Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, and more than a dozen other veterans' organizations oppose the chained CPI.
A chained CPI is out of touch with our daily lives. Let's keep it out of the law.
Tribute to skating pond gets its astronomy wrong
In "Maine Observer: Winter's chill reveals pond's perfection" (Feb. 17), the writer claimed that from a particular spot on Chebeague Island, one could witness the natural marvel of the rising waning moon in the east while the sun set beautifully in the west.
Ummm, that description may sound lovely, but it just ain't so. The only waning moon in the east occurs after the second quarter (full moon) when the sun is already well down. In fact, the only time the waning moon is at half (third quarter) is when the sun is approaching the eastern sky to rise.
This basic (and obvious to anyone who is observant of such matters) error makes me doubt the authenticity of any other details in the account.
Sorry to call that out, but a fact's a fact, and astronomy is not poetry (unless you're Walt Whitman or Robert Frost, but they would have gotten the details right).
Robert L. Petrillo