Friday, December 13, 2013
Why does the press continue to focus on every little problem, no matter how small, that Baxter Academy faces? Certainly CNN, Fox News and the like also focus on everything negative that happens in the world, and little of the many positive events, so maybe the press in Maine is no different.
Recent coverage of Baxter Academy focuses on the negative and doesn’t take into account the widespread support for the charter school and the need to improve STEM education, a reader says.
2013 File Photo/Gordon Chibroski
It appears that the journalists would truly like to see a school fail. Well, I hate to see people disappointed, but Baxter Academy will not fail. If the press would take even a nanosecond to see the energy of Baxter Academy's board, administration and faculty, they would paint a different picture.
The press and any naysayers should also see the excitement in the parents and the students. There is so much positive energy, but it is unlikely that the press will report it. One of my sons told me, "Don't tell anyone, but I'm actually excited for school to start." How often do you hear that?
I'm a longtime conservative liberal, and a strong supporter of public education, but people should not be afraid of charter schools. I believe that the negative statements come from the fear that Baxter Academy will succeed. Fear of change, and wanting to maintain the status quo.
The United States cannot and must not continue the status quo in science, technology, engineering and math education. Change is needed. Baxter Academy will be a model for STEM schools.
Come and see Baxter Academy in six months, 12 months, 18 months, two years. In the meantime, try to find something positive to report about. Look at (and see) the positive in Baxter Academy, and also in the world.
Roundabouts would cause more issues than they solve
Roundabouts have no place in this city, period. So with that said, I just saved the City Council $150,000 on a study ("Portland OKs $150K to start Woodfords Corner upgrade," Aug. 6).
Are they really serious? I have seen roundabouts at work in rural towns that actually work to some extent -- but picture this, a roundabout at the intersection of the University of Southern Maine.
It's rush hour traffic. One person hesitates to enter the roundabout, and now traffic is backing up because everyone knows that you have to enter the roundabout in a safe manner between oncoming cars.
And if I am not mistaken, according to the article I read, they want another at Bedford Street and Deering Avenue -- that's two roundabouts within 50 yards of each other.
Taking in account the size they would have to be, we would be losing parts of the park areas and having to pay landowners money for taking some of their property (not that these property owners have a lot to spare anyway).
Then there's Woodfords Corner. Over the years a lot of work has been done to alleviate traffic problems there, to no avail. Now let's take parking away from the business owners there so people can't stop to make purchases during the drive home. What are you thinking?
I am so glad elections are coming soon. It's time to get rid some of those lame-brained councilors who do not have a clue what's best for the people of Portland. Even better, maybe even I will run next year, to add another vote against wasteful spending at City Hall.
On a quick note: Do we really need an elected mayor, giving him a salary for what can be done by someone the way it was before? Come this election, please vote these wasteful spenders out of office.
(Continued on page 2)