May 13, 2013

Letters to the editor: NRA brushes off risks guns pose to kids

During the recent National Rifle Association convention, a seminar titled "Home Defense Concepts" was conducted by Rob Pincus, a so-called "gun safety advocate and firearms instructor."

nra leadership forum
click image to enlarge

CEO Wayne LaPierre addresses the National Rifle Association convention May 4. A reader says he was disturbed by reports that those at the convention were advised to store guns in youngsters’ bedrooms.

2013 File Photo/The Associated Press

Pincus recommended to attendees that a "quick-access safe (containing guns of course, loaded and ready to be fired) be placed in the closet of your kids' room."

His rationale for this advice is "that in a home invasion, it makes sense to have a gun stored in a bedroom you're instinctively moving to defend." This mind-boggling proposal comes soon after a 5-year-old boy shot and killed his 2-year-old sister in Kentucky.

Not concerned with the real possibility of a child managing to make entry into a "quick-access safe" and playing with the guns, as the Kentucky 5-year-old did, he dismisses it as an insignificant problem.

Pincus' classes "focus on scenarios when the homeowner is surprised and required to make split-second decisions."

His preference would be to instinctively rush into the child's room, open a locked safe and arm himself, not knowing where the possible intruder may be or if he has a weapon.

There is no mention of dialing 911 at any point to call for law enforcement officers, armed and trained to deal with these situations.

Pincus advocates that "gun owners must be prepared to use lethal force," a shoot-first-ask-questions-later philosophy that has often resulted in loss of innocent lives.

The subliminal message at the seminar and throughout the convention was, "Whether or not you may need them, buy more guns. This paid advertisement sponsored by your friendly gun manufacturers."

Sam Kamin

Cumberland

Corporate tax evaders help weaken social safety net

I passionately share the concerns about unemployment and the social safety net that Ann Roberts from Alfred expressed in her April 30 letter, "Amnesty bill would ensure needy in U.S. get even less."

However, I think immigration reform is actually one of the answers to our concerns.

The currently proposed immigration reform legislation is a bill that provides a tough but fair roadmap to citizenship for millions of individuals who are already living and working in this country just like you and me.  

Denying an opportunity to the 11 million Americans-in-waiting who are working hard and contributing to our schools, communities and economy will not secure the social safety net for citizens.

I believe that closing tax loopholes that allow corporations to avoid paying billions in taxes every year, reforming our tax system to ask the wealthiest Americans to start paying their fair share in income tax, and mindfully shifting priorities to invest in job creation and quality schools are undoubtedly better answers to the concerns of our middle class than thoughtlessly demonizing hardworking immigrants.  

Immigrants are a part of the middle and working class in this country; they work alongside us, seek to support their families and contribute every day with their labor, taxes and civic participation to our country.

Only by working together have we built the United States we see today.

This is an issue we need to work on together not only to make our country work but to make us prosperous again. Their concerns are also our concerns.  

Shutting out immigrants who are striving to take full responsibility for their role in this nation, while allowing corporations to evade their tax responsibility, is not right and it's just not the answer.  

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors




Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)