November 19, 2012

Letters to the editor: Obama unfairly attacked over Libya

I find it disgraceful that the Republicans are politicizing the tragic events at the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi.

click image to enlarge

A paramilitary soldier guards the U.S. Consulate in Karachi, Pakistan, in 2002, after an attack in which 10 people died. There were several lethal attacks on U.S. diplomatic stations when George W. Bush was president, but Democrats didn't call for a "Watergate-style commission," as Republicans have in the Benghazi, Libya, attack, a reader says.

2002 file photo/The Associated Press

Not long before these horrific events, the same Republican lawmakers voted against a request by the State Department for additional funding at diplomatic facilities in troubled countries. As Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said, these funding cuts would be "detrimental to America's national security."

These desperate, transparent and hysterical attacks on President Obama and his administration are a continuation of the Republicans' pre-election strategy to disrespect, disparage and diminish him.

Our embassies and other diplomatic facilities have always been at high risk for intrusions and violent attacks.

In 1983, under Ronald Reagan's administration, the Marine barracks at the U.S. Embassy in Beirut were bombed, causing the deaths of more than 200 American servicemen.

Under President George W. Bush, there were attacks on the U.S. Consulate in Karachi, Pakistan, in which 10 were killed. The U.S. Embassy in Uzbekistan was a target, resulting in two deaths. An attack on the U.S. Consulate in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, caused five deaths. By the time Bush left office, there also had been lethal attacks against U.S. diplomatic stations in Syria and Yemen.

It didn't seem to occur to Democrats to criticize President Bush as a failed commander-in-chief, duplicitous or incompetent after these episodes, or to request a "Watergate-style commission." For the Republicans to do so now is despicable and unconscionable.

The behavior of the Republicans, especially Sens. John McCain and Lindsey Graham, is especially egregious in view of Ambassador Christopher Stevens' father's request to Republicans to stop politicizing his son's death. The Republican Party continues to demonstrate its priority: to place party above country to the point of dishonor.

Bill Ronalds


Special limits on voting might ease Webster's fears

I would feel so safe if Charlie Webster stopped those hordes of "black people" (not to mention women) from voting. Did his sources say they were being bused from town to town? I'll bet there were thousands.

Doesn't Mr. Webster think the answer is to clamp down with a voting ID issued only to valid resident Republicans he can personally vouch for? Then the Republican Party could take its rightful place as supreme and absolute permanent ruler.

Okay, I've had my say. Now Bill Nemitz doesn't have to write his column.

Richard Craven


Media offer conflicting data on the violent crime rate

All this confusion about media. About who is telling us what we need to know to make informed and responsible decisions concerning America's future. Well, here's one for you:

An article in the front section of USA Today states that the violent crime rate went up 17 percent last year, citing a Justice Department report.

About two weeks later, an article in the front section of the Oct. 30 Portland Press Herald (Dispatches, "Number of violent crimes decreases for fifth year") states that the violent crime rate went down 3.8 percent last year, citing a study by the FBI.

Almost like sitting midcourt, watching a tennis match.

John Orr


Rich households, firms best situated to handle tax hikes

Changing taste and technology affect small businesses. I used to make a good living selling physical books online; with the rise of e-books, I've had to shift occupations.  

That's the risk of commerce, and it has nothing to do with federal tax rates.  

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors

Further Discussion

Here at we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)