search
April 26, 2010

Another View: Pingree wrong to support national health care reform law

The new law does not save money, it just robs Medicare to pay for a brand new entitlement.

By DEAN SCONTRAS

One of my mother's favorite sayings is, "you can't rob Peter to pay Paul." I was reminded of this by the recent health care bill -- it merely robs from Medicare to create a new entitlement program -- and mom doesn't like it.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Dean Scontras lives in Eliot and is a Republican candidate for Congress in the 1st District.

Meanwhile, U.S. Rep. Chellie Pingree seems to think the legislation did not go far enough (Maine Voices, April 16).

Economists like to use the word triage when discussing the health care dilemma: the sorting of patients (as in an emergency room) according to the urgency of their need for care.

The term better illustrates the potential impact of the health care legislation than any current "crisis". Historically, doctors and nurses must make life-and-death decisions based on the likelihood of survival and the limited availability of resources -- medication, nurses, doctors, etc.

Under the new health care law, the government will now take a larger role in this triage process.

According to an article in The New York Times, "Mr. Obama has urged advisers to consider moving sooner to set up an Independent Advisory Board for controlling Medicare spending."

Independent Advisory Board? Control? The article continues, "Some administration officials fear that creating the board before 2014 could prematurely make it a target for attacks by people worried about a 'death panel.' "

Sounds like an exaggeration. However, this Independent Advisory Board will be forced to participate in the economics of triage, to serve as the hand that will guide doctors and nurses through the battlefield of Medicare, and it will make decisions based upon economics.

Rep. Pingree continues to cite human pain and suffering as the motivation for passing the largest piece of social legislation ever.

She should know better. Nancy Pelosi and Chellie Pingree cannot wave a magic wand and make everyone better. Neither can an "Independent Advisory Board." They are simply robbing Peter to pay Paul.

Even worse, they are creating a government panel to determine who will get care, and who will not.

 

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send Question/Comment to the Publisher




Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)


Most...