Wednesday, December 11, 2013
History matters. My wife and I have made numerous journeys to the Mideast, to the West Bank and Israel proper, experiencing the hospitality of both Palestinians and Israelis alike.
A Palestinian schoolgirl is seen through a hole in a blackboard Monday, days after an Israeli strike hit a school in Gaza City. Readers differ on how to reach resolution to the Israeli-Arab conflict.
2012 File Photo/The Associated Press
It is important that individuals judging the Israeli-Arab conflict recall the "beginnings" of historical events, as over time the facts of such beginnings always seem to take a back seat in relation to what is happening in the present.
• Fact 1: In 1947 the U.N. Partition Plan provided for independent Arab and Israeli states, with Jerusalem as an "independent" city. The Arabs rejected this mandate, while Israel accepted it.
As a result, Egypt, Trans-Jordan, Iraq, Libya, Sudan, Lebanon and Syria attacked Israel. Following the conflict, Trans-Jordan controlled the Old City of Jerusalem and what we today refer to as the "West Bank," not the Palestinians.
• Fact 2: In September 2005, the Israelis left the Gaza Strip, dismantling all their settlements. The Palestinians then had the opportunity to create a peaceful state by development of industry and tourism, through the use of billions of dollars provided to them over time by the worldwide community and various organizations.
Instead, both Arab factions (Hamas and Fatah) fought and killed each other, Hamas exiting the conflict as the victor. As a result, this new "Gaza government" continued to preach the destruction of Israel and sent suicide bombers and Qassam rockets into Israel to kill innocent civilians.
Hamas Charter, Article No. 7: "The day of judgment will not come about until Muslims fight the Jews (killing the Jews), when the Jew will hide behind stones and trees. The stones and trees will say, 'TO Muslims, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him. Allah, count them and kill them to the last one, and don't leave even one alive.'"
What more has to be said?
I urge everyone to read Robert Schaible's commentary "Maine Voices: Israel's victim image belies its drive to control, abuse Palestinians" (Nov. 24).
In my view, the author sketches the background history in an even-handed way. All nine of Schaible's objective references quote Israelis.
I hope that readers who might be put off by the fact it is written by the chair of Maine Voices for Palestinian Rights will recognize the author's genuine desire for a lasting resolution in Israel/Palestine.
Without peace, all will suffer. With it, all sides will gain. May the latest cease-fire and a letter like this one begin that process.
Elaine G. McGillicuddy
Election night protesters have not learned from past
It was deeply disturbing to read that 400 students at the University of Mississippi protested President Obama's victory on election night ("Obama victory sparks protest at Ole Miss," Nov. 7). Derogatory racial statements were voiced at this demonstration.
I thought this nation had moved on from the hard-fought struggles and gains of the 1960s. How did this happen? What have we been teaching our children and our children's children for the last 50 years?
Are we as a nation really this deeply divided? What can be done to bridge this apparent chasm?
Perhaps the personal connection between the president and governor of New Jersey during Hurricane Sandy might give us a clue. Hopefully, during times of crisis and need, people put the common good above political differences and social ideals.
Crosby, Stills, and Nash once sang "Teach your children well." Maybe this is where the process begins.
Call Kissinger's successors by their academic titles, too
Thanks for publishing the biographical article on Susan Rice ("Potential top diplomat stirs debate," Nov. 22). I had not known that she holds two graduate degrees from Oxford, nor that she had been a Rhodes Scholar.
(Continued on page 2)