Mostly Cloudy

High: 79°

Low: 56°

High Tide

11:41 PM

Low Tide

5:55 AM


Find a car, truck suvSearch Maine Real Estate
Portland Press Herald Facebook pagePortland Press Herald Twitter PageMaine news RSS feeds
July 31

Letters to the editor, July 31, 2010
Homeless suffer, deserve better from us

When I was young, a convergence of crises meant that I had to find a new place to live. I also had two amiable cats and I persisted until I found a place that allowed animals.

At that point in my life, losing my pets would have dealt a critical blow to me on top of other events. The cats were my lifeline, and I could express my need for connection and caring.

A number of people who commented online in response to your July 12 article, "Homeless men to get basic care for dogs," made cruel comments, indicating what I saw as a desire to sweep away "disposable" people and deprive them of their last support system, a pet.

Yes, homeless people have many problems. The ones you see acting out in the street are the visible layer. Most are too desperate and are busy trying to stay afloat.

I witnessed one man who had lost his job and his apartment, and then finally found a place to live but was forced to give up his dog; he was nearly incoherent with tears.

Most people don't make a career choice to be drunks, druggies, mentally ill or homeless or any version of what we consider unacceptable. Childhood neglect or abuse, poor education, lack of parenting or resources, or no place to go can lead people to shelters or to crime, or both.

There is no single formula for overcoming these dire obstacles and the psychological devastation that can accompany them.

In a recent report, Androscoggin County Sheriff Guy Desjardins pointed out the link between poverty and crime. Yes, a "good-paying job" helps one out of poverty, but only if one has fixed personal problems in order to get the job.

Early childhood education, help for parents in crisis, and available resources can all help direct a child toward a more constructive life off the streets.

Give credit to the homeless who maintain one last lifeline -- a pet -- and the spirit that causes someone to nurture that creature. Support the animal shelter that helps strengthen that bond, rather than adding one more penalty.

Dawn Leland

Portland

Photos of pets, nature refreshing to take in

How very refreshing to have wonderful animal pictures and nature pictures in your paper and online sent by readers. There is so much bad news all the time, that it is truly life-giving see these lovely pictures.

Thank you, and do keep it up.

Charlene Rossignol

Saco

Nothing amiss with dancing to celebrate life and liberty

Your In Focus feature of July 16, "We came from the ashes," about a Holocaust survivor's dancing with his family in Auschwitz and worldwide reactions, brought to mind a similar controversy involving the Berlin Wall.

Shortly after the Wall came down, pieces of it were offered in our country at $20 each. At the time, my first reaction was negative, for how could anyone profit from it? A writer wrote to the local paper decrying that a symbol of oppression and even deaths to those fleeing Communist East Germany should be for sale.

This letter was some days later followed by one from a man who bought a piece of the Berlin Wall for his father, an escapee from East Germany, who wept on receiving it -- as a symbol of a repressive regime that had finally been destroyed and the triumph of freedom.

Dancing at Auschwitz, or rejoicing over a chunk of the Wall, survivors rightfully have the final word.

Carl Scheiman

Walpole

Postal Service only choice for daily delivery of mail

 

I am writing this letter in response to the editorial July 8 about letting other firms compete with the Postal Service in delivering mail.

Having private companies deliver mail would be a great mistake! It sounds like the way to go, having competition, but it would mean no mail delivery to your house or business.

Think about it. They want to make the most money possible and part of that would mean that they would only deliver to the most densely populated areas.

Would you deliver mail to small towns where the profit margin would be nonexistent? No! They would take the big markets like New York City, Los Angeles or Chicago, but they won't touch the small towns unless you pay a higher price for delivery.

At the present time you can mail a letter anywhere and have it delivered to a house or business at a pretty cheap price! If we allow other firms to deliver mail everyone will have to go to a central facility with thousands of boxes to pick up or send their mail because we won't be able to deliver it, and I don't think people would be too happy about that.

I have worked for the Postal Service for 30 years and, yes, we have some problems that we cannot overcome, but we can deliver the mail better than anyone else at a lower price and deliver it to your house or business without you having to go and get your mail from a box.

John Votto

Gardiner

Lawmakers told to value workers, but they forgot it

This article will take you back many years, 41 to be exact.

At the age of 17, I was asked to present a basket of apples to the members to the Senate and the House of Representatives, in full session at the State House. The fact that I was not asked to speak aroused my curiosity, so I decided to do just that.

"When I hold this apple in my hand, I wonder who picked it. I wonder who lifted the heavy load onto the truck, who trucked the apples to the warehouse? I wonder who received it at the warehouse. I wonder who placed the apples on display, that all I need to do is pick it up and eat it!

"You, because you make the laws that govern the people, must never forget that I mentioned the picker first."

I expected to leave that chamber in stark silence. Instead, all the representatives stood in unison and rendered me a very long, deafening ovation!

Too bad they have since forgotten that I mentioned the "picker" first.

Ann B. Moody

Gorham

 

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send Question/Comment to the Publisher

7 COMMENTS

Scrib said...

Mr. Scheiman- I read the article about the survivor and his grandkids dancing at Aushcwitz and then went to Youtube and watched the video. Here was a man who survived the unimaginable still able to express joy in his victory over his tormmentors. When he made a face, peering through the cattle car, one has to think that he probably arrived there in a similar one so many years ago and somehow triumphed through the horror- and he had his progeny with him to prove it! Thanks for the nice letter.

July 31, 2010 at 4:50 AM Report abuse

UofA said...

Dawn Leland- Please come and visit the Tedford Shelter in Brunswick and tell me that most of the people there have not chosen their way of life. I have hired some of them to do some temp. jobs around my property but have ceased doing so. I have rented apts. to 4 of them and will no longer do so when the 4th one leaves. They refuse to look for work or respect my property and I do not owe them anything any more!

July 31, 2010 at 10:56 AM Report abuse

JWR said...

UofA, you sound like the slum lords in Portland who live off the rental assistance vouchers.

July 31, 2010 at 11:36 AM Report abuse

JWR said...

Dawn Leland of Portland,-- I can fully appreciate your letter, and I'm amaze by your terminology. But I am against it because it is cruel. And the ones who really need that life line don't have one. The public has absolutely no clue about homelessness and the great myth within the community that works in and around the homeless is they do. As a homeless advocate myself, and for some years now I don't fully understand it. We may understand additions and to a degree mental illness, but one must experience homelessness beyond couch surfing. I can just jump into my convertible with my privacy and along with my American Express platinum just get away from it all.

July 31, 2010 at 11:50 AM Report abuse

AFVET said...

My first comment was deemed unworthy -- Harmon must be the gatekeeper today. I'll try again. UofA: If you would tell us WHY those homeless people proved unacceptable we might learn something. You might learn something too. I suspect that you assumed that the recipients of your altruism (if that is what it was) grasped their positions in the structure of society -- that is, shared your assumptions. But did they? I would not sit someone down in the cockpit of an aircraft and expect them to know how to fly it. Ever wonder about 'all those intruments'? It takes training and a lot of experience to develop an effective crosscheck. And it takes a lot of patience on the part of the instructor-pilot to encourage that control and discipline.

July 31, 2010 at 1:05 PM Report abuse

AFVET said...

That's 'instruments'!

July 31, 2010 at 1:06 PM Report abuse

Chew said...

Although I have sympathy for those who are homeless and certainly can relate to the bond of having a pet, reality is often an unkind reminder of where our priorities need to be. "Needing" a pet is the wrong reason to have a pet and the additional expenses, no matter how seemingly small of caring for a pet, are a reminder that we need to place shelter, food, and an opportunity for gainful employment above such things as pets. I am quite fortunate in that I do have employment and a roof over my head. I also have one pet, because I made the choice based on want, not need, and I pay for my choice with vet bills, pet food, demands on my time, and pet "accessories" as needed by the pet. If I were homeless my first priority would be finding income sufficient to put a roof over my head and food on my table. I would hope other homeless people would share this reality before purchasing or aquiring a pet.

July 31, 2010 at 1:06 PM Report abuse

Most...