Wednesday, April 16, 2014
As someone with deep ancestral roots in Canada, it has been eye-opening to see a Canadian consulate representative at every public meeting involving the potential movement of heavy crude Alberta tar-sands oil across Maine to be offloaded into tankers in Casco Bay.
Chris Jones of Albian Sands Energy describes the company's Fort McMurray, Alberta, oil-sands project in 2005. Canada's government, greatly invested in tar sands' success, is pressing for the transmission of tar-sands oil from Montreal to Portland, a reader says.
2005 File Photo/The Associated Press
The most current appearance was April 11, at a Portland Water District informational meeting.
Trustees of the Water District and community observers also listened to a U.S. government representative, a New England Petroleum Institute representative and Portland Pipe Line Corp. officials present their case for the transmission of heavy crude from Montreal to Portland Harbor.
I probably shouldn't be surprised by the consistent Canadian presence here. Prime Minister Stephen Harper's government is also energetically lobbying its own citizenry, since community groups in Canada from British Columbia to Montreal are objecting to tar-sands oil being pumped through their neighborhoods and offloaded into tankers in their coastal waters -- just as we are in Portland.
Why wouldn't the Harper government send emissaries hither and yon when so much of the Canadian economy has unfortunately been dumped into the Alberta tar sands basket?
It also should not be lost on anyone that the Portland-to-Montreal pipeline is majority owned by ExxonMobil's Canadian subsidiary Imperial Oil and Canadian oil giant Suncor.
We have a classic David-and-Goliath story unfolding all over Canada and the United States as small community groups face off against these petroleum potentates. In the days that come, we will need to decide which side we are on.
Lawmakers' support of MD research appreciated
In February my youngest son, Patrick, and I traveled to Washington to advocate on behalf of those in Maine affected by muscular dystrophy, seeking reauthorization of legislation directing the National Institutes of Health to continue treating these disorders as a priority and the Centers for Disease Control to update "best practices" information for treatments.
I've made this trip annually, since 2001, when the original Muscular Dystrophy Community Assistance, Research and Education Act was sponsored by Sens. Susan Collins and Paul Wellstone. This law must be periodically renewed.
Considering that the age of survival for patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy has increased by 10 years and that research on these disorders has attracted many millions in private-sector investment leading to new drug development, I believe this legislation has been worthwhile.
Patrick and I visited each office of our Maine delegation.
We met with Sen. Collins, who again chose to be an original co-sponsor to reauthorize the act, stating she wanted to sustain the momentum this law has established. My family and I are grateful for her steadfast support.
We had a lengthy conversation with Sen. Angus King about muscular dystrophy, our hope for current research and the work being done at the Jackson Laboratories in Bar Harbor and how the lab supports research related to this legislation.
We met with the aides who focus on health-related issues for Reps. Chellie Pingree and Mike Michaud. Reps. Pingree and Michaud have consistently supported my efforts.
I am pleased Maine's entire delegation has joined Sen. Collins as co-sponsors. I want to thank each member and their staff for the time spent discussing the effects of muscular dystrophy on families and the importance of research for those living with these disorders.
Thanks to all who shoveled snow for elderly over winter
(Continued on page 2)