Politics

November 27, 2013

J.D. Irving gets exemption on Maine clear-cutting rules

The deal with the state exempts Maine’s largest landowner’s 1.25 million acres of forest land from some regulations.

By Steve Mistler smistler@pressherald.com
Staff Writer

State forestry officials have entered into an agreement with J.D. Irving Ltd., Maine’s largest landowner, that allows the company to exempt its 1.25 million acres of forest land from some clear-cutting regulations and other harvesting standards of the Forest Practices Act.

The five-year agreement was signed in May 2012 but wasn’t made public until this month, when the Maine Forest Service gave lawmakers a report on an experimental tree harvesting program known as Outcome Based Forestry.

The program had not drawn any participants since it was established in 2001, but now interest among major timberland owners is on the rise, as word spreads about the deal that allows J.D. Irving to do individual clear-cuts of as much as 250 acres without state approval.

Environmental groups say agreements with major landowners that are largely confidential and push regulatory oversight to a panel appointed by Gov. Paul LePage could endanger the state’s approximately 10 million acres of certified forest land.

Outcome Based Forestry was never intended to be the “bonanza” that the J.D. Irving agreement represents, said Pete Didisheim, advocacy director for the Natural Resources Council of Maine.

“There has been little interest from others before now because I don’t think anybody ever really anticipated that you could get away with this,” he said.

State officials say the agreement with J.D. Irving, and another with the state Bureau of Parks and Lands, will be monitored closely by a panel of experts. They say that there is a scientific rationale for each harvest, and that the aesthetic impact of a cut is reviewed beforehand.

Doug Denico, director of the Maine Forest Service, wrote in a report to the Legislature’s Agriculture, Conservation and Forestry Committee, dated Nov. 13, that there were “intensive” field inspections of harvest sites on J.D. Irving’s land.

Robert Wagner, director of the University of Maine’s School of Forest Resources and Center for Research on Sustainable Forests, is a member of the six-member advisory panel that is overseeing the program. He told the legislative committee Friday that the program will improve forest management practices that have declined since the adoption of the “prescriptive” Forest Practices Act in 1989.

He and other members of the advisory panel said the Outcome Based Forestry program gives landowners more flexibility to effectively manage timberlands, reduce fragmentation between cuts, and increase pest and weed management.

COMPROMISE FOR INDUSTRY

Conservation groups acknowledge the merits of science-based forest management. But critics say the agreement with J.D. Irving defies the original intent of the Outcome Based Forestry program, which was enacted amid a series of debates over clear-cutting that pitted conservationists against the state’s dominant forest products industry.

The program was seen as a compromise for the industry, which had complained that the Forest Practices Act put politics over science and prohibited landowners from doing effective timber harvesting.

The program originally was limited to “experimental” parcels, with no single harvest area exceeding 100,000 acres and a statewide limit of six areas totaling 200,000 acres. Lawmakers lifted the size limits in 2007 and removed a sunset provision in 2011.

J.D. Irving expressed interest in participating in the program after the acreage cap was removed, but it was unable to strike a deal until 2012, when it signed the five-year plan with the LePage administration.

Ked Coffin, a forester employed by Irving, said the program will raise Irving’s softwood harvest by 70 percent over the next 35 years, has helped to increase contractors’ earnings by 21 percent, and is a factor in the company’s plan, announced in August, to build a $30 million sawmill in Ashland.

Irving’s harvest level is not subject to public disclosure because state law treats the information as proprietary.

TIMBER HARVEST INCREASES

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors




Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)


Blogs

Open Season - Yesterday
Collins lands BIW union endorsements

More PPH Blogs