June 20, 2013

LePage vetoes sweeping Maine energy bill, but House overrides him

The bipartisan bill, which would help lower energy costs for Mainers, must pass a veto override in the Senate before becoming law.

By Michael Shepherd mshepherd@mainetoday.com
State House Bureau

AUGUSTA — As promised, Gov. Paul LePage vetoed a sweeping energy bill that had bipartisan support in the Maine Legislature late Wednesday night. 

click image to enlarge

In this file photo, a scale model of UMaine's VolturnUS wind turbine, which was christened in May. As promised, Gov. Paul LePage vetoed a sweeping energy bill with bipartisan support in the Legislature late Wednesday, June 19, 2013 because of his support for the VolturnUS project..

Gordon Chibroski / Staff Photographer

Related headlines

About an hour later — after the session stretched into Thursday morning — the House of Representatives overrode him, though the Senate must also do so for the bill to become law. That vote is expected next week.

The House overrode LePage by a 121-11 margin, signaling both parties’ attachment to the bill, which would be a crowning achievement for legislators in a session marred by conflict between legislative Democrats and the governor.

“This bill will reduce the cost of energy in Maine by at least $200 million a year,” said House Minority Leader Kenneth Fredette, R-Newport, on the House floor. “It will help protect jobs in our bills, keep people employed and allow for future economic development in the state of Maine.”

The Legislature passed the omnibus energy bill, L.D. 1559, earlier this month by wide margins in both the House and Senate. 

LePage had to veto the bill by midnight Wednesday or let it become law without his signature. He nixed it in the last 10 minutes he had, a decision Senate Majority Leader Seth Goodall, D-Richmond, called a “shortsighted” risk to state economic development.

Ericka Dodge, a spokeswoman for Senate Democrats, said the body received the veto message around 11:50 p.m. Wednesday.

Bill sponsors said the proposal would aid in lowering energy costs for Mainers in a number of ways, including expanding natural gas pipelines, increasing energy-efficiency program funding and helping residents convert to affordable heating systems.

But LePage’s energy director, Patrick Woodcock, told the Portland Press Herald on Tuesday that if the bill wasn’t amended to help the University of Maine's offshore floating wind project, the governor wouldn’t back it. 

Woodcock said early Thursday morning that he couldn’t talk to a reporter. On Tuesday, the governor’s spokeswoman said LePage’s office wouldn’t participate in Press Herald stories because the newspaper “had made it clear that it opposed this administration.”

However, in LePage's veto message, he reiterated that the UMaine issue was the only one keeping him from signing the bill.

“There are many things we disagree on, but we should all agree that our flagship university deserves the opportunity to compete on a level playing field,” LePage wrote.

The governor wants to support UMaine’s VolturnUS pilot project over a competing venture being developed by Statoil USA, a Norwegian energy company. LePage opposed the terms of a contract along with an above-market power rate for Statoil approved last winter by the Maine Public Utilities Commission.

He wants to create a new process at the PUC by which both projects could be evaluated to weigh the benefits of each to ratepayers, according to Woodcock, who has said that would ensure ratepayers get the best deal before a final contract is signed with Statoil and the PUC this summer.

Early Thursday morning, Goodall said if LePage's veto held, it would risk Statoil's promise to invest $120 million to develop offshore-wind technology. 

“We had an opportunity to grow an industry here, an offshore wind industry, to make us a leader in the country,” Goodall said. “The governor jeopardized that.”

He also said legislators offered other ways to promote UMaine's involvement in the technology's development. Rep. Ryan Tipping-Spitz, D-Orono, also said he checked the bill with the university. He deemed it “a good bill.”

On the floor, Fredette went further, saying the bill protects the university.

“By not passing the energy bill, my belief is, and I can stand corrected, the University of Maine is completely out of the game,” he said.

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors

Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)


More PPH Blogs