Thursday, December 12, 2013
AUGUSTA — Lawyers who represent workers in unemployment benefits cases plan to ask Maine's attorney general to investigate claims that Gov. Paul LePage pressured unemployment hearing officers to rule in favor of business owners over workers.
Lawyers who represent workers say Gov. Paul LePage has been interfering with the federally governed unemployment process, and have asked the Maine Attorney General to investigate. The LePage administration denies any wrongdoing.
Staff File Photo
Democratic lawmakers and the union representing state employees also voiced concerns Thursday about a meeting that LePage and several staff members held March 21 at the Blaine House with about eight hearing officers and their supervisors.
The meeting should never have happened, said David Webbert, president of the Maine Employment Lawyers Association.
"It's troubling on many levels," he said. "It erodes people's confidence in the process and gives the impression that the process is rigged."
Peter Steele, a spokesman for LePage, disputed claims that LePage sought to sway the officers. He said those allegations were made by disgruntled employees, and that the governor neither threatened nor scolded the hearing examiners.
The accusations surfaced in a story first reported by the Sun Journal in Lewiston. The paper, citing several anonymous sources, detailed the meeting to which LePage summoned the employees of the Department of Labor.
According to the Sun Journal, several who attended the lunch meeting said LePage scolded about eight administrative hearing officers and their supervisors for deciding too many cases in favor of employees.
The hearings determine whether a business has to pay unemployment benefits. They are conducted within the Bureau of Unemployment by administrative hearing officers, who act as adjudicators in disputes between businesses and employees who have been laid off or fired.
The officers, many of whom are lawyers, hold federally funded jobs and their rulings are governed by federal guidelines.
The newspaper did not identify the hearing officers who complained because they sought anonymity for fear of losing their jobs or facing retribution by the LePage administration. The paper said it contacted more than a dozen sources to confirm the meeting.
Labor Commissioner Jeanne Paquette and John Butera, a senior member of LePage's staff, both attended. They said Thursday that the meeting was called to fix what the administration described as "systematic inconsistency" in the adjudication of claims appeals.
They said allegations that LePage was threatening during the meeting are untrue.
"The governor wanted to engage them," Paquette said. "This was an education piece for him, too. ... (The hearing officers) all spoke. If they were intimidated, they sure didn't show it."
Butera said, "What the governor wanted is consistency, so that everyone is being treated the same."
The administration provided a copy of a memo that served as discussion material for the meeting. Before the meeting, LePage made a series of handwritten notes on the memo, underlining issues that he thought were most important.
He highlighted a section noting that the current law does not weigh whether a benefit claimant did something "intentionally or recklessly" to get injured.
"This is critical," LePage wrote. "Employees have to be made accountable for their actions."
The memo, with names and other parties redacted, cited hearings in which officers did not allow information provided by employers. Hearing officers have discretion to include or discard evidence.
Labor Department officials said hearing officers sometimes exclude information if it's duplicative, can't be proven or is irrelevant to the appeal.
Administration officials said LePage questioned during the meeting why some of the information hadn't been allowed as evidence.
Butera said he didn't know if any of the hearing officers at the meeting were involved in the cases in the memo.
(Continued on page 2)