July 5, 2013

Bonding dispute may slash Maine road work

Projects will be dropped, and jobs lost, if lawmakers can't agree on the details of a $100 million proposal.

By Eric Russell erussell@pressherald.com
Staff Writer

More than one-third of the funding for state highway construction projects and one-quarter of funding for bridge projects approved for 2014 and 2015 could be in jeopardy if lawmakers fail to move forward a $100 million bond proposal.

click image to enlarge

Rep. Kenneth Fredette, Maine House minority leader

click image to enlarge

Sen. Justin Alfond, Maine Senate president

Related headlines

Bruce Van Note, deputy commissioner of the Maine Department of Transportation, said officials have been in touch recently with Democratic and Republican leaders about the need for bond funding, but uncertainty remains.

"They understand we need this because it's tied to our budget, and I believe they will do something, but the timing is important," Van Note said.

Both parties agree that a transportation bond is crucial. However, as was the case during the past legislative session, there is discord about how to proceed.

Democrats appear to want to include transportation funding as part of a larger bond package that also would include money for research and development and for natural resources.

Senate President Justin Alfond and House Speaker Mark Eves announced this week that they have directed the Appropriations Committee to spend the summer debating the roughly two dozen bond proposals on the table and turn them into one package. That package could then be voted on during a special session this fall in advance of the November election. All state bonds require voter approval.

Republicans, including Gov. Paul LePage, want to deal with bonds separately.

"The governor has put together a strong targeted transportation bond that focuses on jobs and the economy, and House Republicans would be supportive of that as a standalone bill," said House Minority Leader Kenneth Fredette. "If Democrats attempt to lump together the bonds into one package, I don't think Republicans in the House will go for it. We're not in a spending mood."

Now that the state budget and most other policy issues have been settled by the 126th Legislature, the rhetoric is starting to heat up over bonds.

Earlier this week, Alfond accused the governor of holding up bonds that already have been approved by voters.

"People's jobs are on the line, our roads are crumbling. Our economy cannot wait any longer for this economic shot in the arm," he said in a written statement. "The governor should do what he said he was going to do and follow the will of the people by releasing the bonds."

LePage responded with a statement reminding the Democratic leaders that he instructed state Treasurer Neria Douglass on May 23 to prepare the approved bonds.

"It's laughable that Senator Alfond is trying to shift the blame when it took him nearly six months to pay Maine's hospital debt," LePage said in a written statement. "He now claims that he is waiting to craft a strategic bond package. But that's just another delaying tactic. Democrats have no strategic plan."

Van Note said MDOT is supportive of the governor's transportation bond, but he said it's more important to have that money one way or the other. Without it, his staff would have to choose from a list of 64 road projects and 58 bridge projects to defund.

More specifically, they would need to cut 26 percent, or $30 million, from the $115 million set aside for bridge projects, and 35 percent, or $46 million, from the $132 million earmarked for highway reconstruction and rehabilitation.

The projects range in size from a $14 million reconstruction of Route 3 on Mount Desert Island, to an $8.7 million bridge replacement project in Bangor, to a $50,000 intersection improvement at Broadway and Waterman Drive in South Portland.

"They would not all be cut, obviously, but this is the pallet we have to choose from," Van Note said. "We'll make decisions on a priority basis the way we always do."

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors

Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)


More PPH Blogs