Friday, December 13, 2013
WASHINGTON – A Republican National Committee report aimed at reviving and modernizing the party could re-ignite debate in Maine over the best way to select a presidential nominee.
Registered Republican voters Elton Anderson, left, of Milbridge, and Gary Willey, right, review presidential comparison materials before the Washington County Republican Super Caucus in February 2012 in East Machias, Maine.
The report released Monday recommends that states, like Maine, that hold caucuses switch to presidential primaries in a reform effort that the authors say will bring more voters into a party that sounds "increasingly out of touch" and has lost its way with younger voters.
The recommendation comes roughly one year after Maine's Republican caucus fractured party activists, and coincides with a power struggle in Maine and nationwide between "establishment" Republicans and their libertarian or tea party counterparts.
The primary recommendation is one of dozens in a blunt self-assessment of the 2012 elections. The report's authors cited drastic changes that will be needed and rehashed many of the criticisms leveled against the party after its losses in November, particularly when it came to attracting new voters.
"Public perception of the Party is at record lows," the report says in its opening lines. "Young voters are increasingly rolling their eyes at what the Party represents, and many minorities wrongly think that Republicans do not like them or want them in the country. When someone rolls their eyes at us, they are not likely to open their ears to us."
Buried among the report's calls for embracing technology and being more open to different viewpoints are recommendations for improving the nomination process. The authors call for limiting the number of primary debates, bumping up the date of the Republican National Convention and -- perhaps most significant to Maine and other caucus states -- encouraging states to switch to primaries.
The report says: "Our party needs to grow its membership and primaries seem to be a more effective way to do so. The greater the number of people who vote in a Republican primary, the more likely they will turn out and vote for the Republican candidate in the fall election."
Maine is one of fewer than a dozen states that hold presidential caucuses rather than statewide primaries. In a caucus, local voters gather at a specific location to hear debates between candidates' supporters before voting, often by show of hands.
In primaries, voters simply go to the polls to cast secret ballots.
Maine's 2012 Republican caucuses and state convention were anything but unifying for the party.
Supporters of libertarian presidential candidate Ron Paul cried foul when party leaders announced that Mitt Romney had won the nonbinding caucuses even though some had not yet voted because their caucuses had been delayed by a snowstorm.
The results did not change even after all of the votes had been tallied. But Paul's well-organized supporters took control of the state convention in May and elected mostly pro-Paul delegates to send to the Republican National Convention.
Half of those delegates subsequently lost their seats and were replaced by Romney supporters after a dust-up with Republican National Committee leaders that spilled onto the convention floor.
Mark Willis, one of Maine's three official representatives to the national committee and a libertarian Republican, disagreed with the report authors' preference for primaries.
Willis said caucuses engage grass-roots activists and help lay the organizational groundwork for the general election. They also give candidates with passionate volunteers but less money a chance to compete, he said.
Willis expressed concern about the report's proposal for shortening the primary season.
"In the end, the only kind of candidate who can pull out a victory in that type of system is a quote-unquote 'establishment candidate' with a large purse," Willis said. "The caucuses are a chance for everyone to come out, and not just the grass-roots. But it gives a chance for the grass-roots to organize."
(Continued on page 2)