September 11, 2013

Civic Center: Pirates 'manufactured' lease crisis

On the eve of the bid for a resolution, trustees file a response to the Portland team’s claims on a lease’s validity.

By Edward D. Murphy emurphy@pressherald.com
Staff Writer

PORTLAND — Lawyers for the Portland Pirates and the Cumberland County Civic Center will face off in court Wednesday morning over whether a valid lease exists for the hockey team to play in the arena this winter.

click image to enlarge

Neal Pratt, chairman of the Cumberland County Civic Center trustees, in a 2013 file photo. The civic center and Portland Pirates have begun firing salvos in court at each other, as the two sides struggle to reach a new lease agreement.

Gordon Chibroski / Staff Photographer

click image to enlarge

In this 2011 file photo, Portland Pirates CEO Brian Petrovek announces the Phoenix Coyotes as the Portland Pirates' new parent club at the Cumberland County Civic Center.

Tim Greenway

Related headlines

The two sides will appear in Cumberland County Business Court to seek an agreement in the Pirates' request for an injunction to force the civic center to let the team play there once a $34 million renovation of the building is completed in January.

The Pirates sued the civic center last week, claiming that a five-year lease agreement that the two sides announced in April is valid.

In a response filed in court Tuesday, the civic center's board of trustees said the two sides agreed only on the broad outlines of a lease in April, and that the board explicitly said more negotiations were needed.

The trustees' response also says that no documents were signed, and that a resolution passed by the board at the time said a final agreement would be subject to another vote by the trustees.

"The Pirates made a legal and tactical decision in the negotiating process that they do not now like the consequences of," the trustees say in the response. "The Pirates have manufactured this 'crisis.'"

The Pirates contend that the agreement announced in April constitutes a valid lease. The civic center responded that that is "demonstrably false," citing emails and lease proposals that were exchanged throughout the summer as evidence that the deal was not final in April.

Courts don't recognize "agreements to agree," the trustees say in the filing, and the civic center should not be required "to perform under the terms of an alleged lease agreement that was never reached."

The filing says that hours after the board approved a resolution outlining the "bullet points" of the deal in April, the managing owner of the Pirates appeared to suggest that he knew the terms weren't complete.

The board passed a resolution on the major points of the agreement April 17. A few hours later, Brian Petrovek, the Pirates' managing owner, said in an email that he planned to begin selling season tickets for 2013-14, "but understand the deal needs to be finalized and signed accordingly in the near future."

Petrovek did not return calls for comment Tuesday. Harold J. Friedman, the lawyer for the Pirates, and Dave Barry, who is handling the lawsuit for the civic center, declined to comment.

Jamie Schwartz, the civic center trustees' lawyer, responded to Petrovek's email, saying that Petrovek could use his own judgment about the two sides' ability to reach the final agreement, and that any steps Petrovek took would be "at your and the Pirates' sole risk."

The loose ends that remained after the announcement in April unraveled further, and the two sides exchanged lease proposals regularly throughout the summer. The civic center sent Petrovek a final offer on Aug. 27 and said he had to sign the lease within 48 hours.

Neither Schwartz nor Neal Pratt, the chairman of the civic center's trustees, returned calls for comment Tuesday.

At issue is revenue from concessions and advertising.

The deal in April called for the Pirates to get 57.5 percent of all concession revenue, but the civic center was told by state authorities in June that the Pirates couldn't share revenue from alcoholic beverages because the team is not on the arena's liquor license.

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors




Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)


 

Blogs

More PPH Blogs

Winter sports 2013-2014

High School Football 2013

Fall sports photos