August 21, 2013

Olympic athletes may face political hurdles

Two U.S. sprinters created civil rights headlines in 1968 -- will there be similar collisions in Sochi in 2014?

By LIZ CLARKE The Washington Post

Two Swedish athletes found their voices last week at the world track and field championships in Day-Glo-colored nail polish, painting rainbows on their fingernails as an expression of solidarity with the gay-pride movement.

Gold medallists team Russia celebrate at the women's 4x400 metres relay victory ceremony during the IAAF World Athletics Championships at the Luzhniki stadium in Moscow
click image to enlarge

Perhaps as a gesture of gay-rights solidarity, two members of Russia's gold medal relay team kissed at the medal ceremony for the World Athletic Championships in Moscow on Aug. 17.


Days later at the Moscow event, two Russian members of the victorious 4x400-meter women's relay team kissed atop the medal podium. Debate erupted on social media at once: Was it a spontaneous celebration or calculated political statement?

Under a Russian law banning "the propaganda of nontraditional sexual relations," the field of play at the 2014 Sochi Olympics stands to become politically charged terrain in which rainbows and kisses could be construed as cause for arrest.

The law, signed by President Vladimir Putin in June, lays out heavy penalties for those deemed to promote homosexuality to anyone under 18.

The International Olympic Committee has requested written clarification but to date has received conflicting reports about whether it will be enforced against participants and spectators to the 2014 Winter Games at the Black Sea resort Feb. 7-23.


With no clear protocol to follow, Sochi-bound athletes are left to wrestle with the question of what silence on the issue represents: Good manners toward the host nation? Tacit approval of a law that appears to violate the Olympic Charter? Something else entirely?

And those who feel compelled to respond have little guidance in parsing the difference between what is an acceptable expression of opinion and what could be deemed an illegal protest and therefore grounds for a fine, arrest or deportation. Can they wear a rainbow-flag T-shirt in the Athletes' Village? What about during a televised interview that might be viewed by a Russian under age 18?

"It's disturbing," Olympic historian David Wallechinsky said of the implications of the law and the tricky calculus of interpreting it. "The athletes don't know. And I don't read Russian, so I don't know the actual intent of the law."

Said Michael Cole-Schwartz, spokesman for the Human Rights Campaign, a prominent gay-rights group: "The way it is so broadly written, any show of support for LGBT people can be criminalized. That could be holding a rainbow flag or saying, 'I support my gay teammates.' Especially for gay people themselves, there is a huge gray area."

The world track and field championships in Moscow served as a test case of sorts.

While no competitor was arrested, Russia's Yelena Isinbayeva, the gold medalist in the pole vault, scolded the manicured Swedish athletes for disrespecting her country's laws and residents, saying Russians "consider ourselves like normal, standard people." Isinbayeva, chosen as the ceremonial mayor of Sochi's Athletes' Village, later issued a statement saying her poor English may have led to a "misunderstanding."

Also at the Moscow event, American Nick Symmonds dedicated his silver medal in the 800 meters to "my gay and lesbian friends back home." And previously, Johnny Weir, an openly gay American figure skater and bronze medalist at the 2008 world championships, said he would gladly get arrested to draw attention to the injustice of the law should he qualify for the 2014 U.S. squad.

Isolated calls for a boycott of the Sochi Games have been rejected by President Barack Obama and found no traction among those in the Olympic movement.

Senior IOC member Gerhard Heiberg of Norway recently raised the specter of moving the Games unless Russia respected the words of the Olympic Charter. But that, too, appears to be a nonstarter.

"The IOC has a history of not acting on human-rights questions," Wallechinsky said. "There is no way the IOC is going to take the Games away from Russia. It is too big, and they are too powerful."

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors

Further Discussion

Here at we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)



Clearing the Bases - Yesterday
Pitching, pitching, pitching

More PPH Blogs

Winter sports 2013-2014

High School Football 2013

Fall sports photos