August 14, 2013

Patriots can least afford to lose Brady, but then who?

Commentary: The Patriots have several candidates, and those who follow the team have several ideas.


FOXBOROUGH, Mass. — When it comes to deciding which player the New England Patriots can least afford to lose this season, or any season, the answer is easy. Tom Brady tops the list. That's a given.

Aqib Talib
click image to enlarge

Aqib Talib is so needed in the secondary that when he was hurt in the AFC final last season, the Patriots fell apart.

The Associated Press

Vince Wilfork
click image to enlarge

Vince Wilfork is the man in the middle who stops the run, but there are other pivotal players on defense.

The Associated Press

For the sake of debate we ask: Who's next? Which player, beyond Brady, can the Pats ill afford to have off the field for any extended period of time? Who's next on the priority list, especially in wake of all that's transpired during the offseason?

Is it Vince Wilfork? Aqib Talib? Danny Amendola? Chandler Jones? Stevan Ridley? Jerod Mayo? Someone else?

Rob Gronkowski is already injured and on the physically unable to perform list, so he's off the board in this exercise. His absence might factor into the answer for some people, though.

My pick?

Wilfork immediately came to mind. It's hard to go wrong with the defensive lineman. He's a force. But I'm going to throw a curveball. Having watched Talib the past few weeks in training camp and how the secondary follows his lead, not to mention how the defense fell completely apart after his departure in the AFC championship game against the Baltimore Ravens, there's a strong case to be made for the cornerback.

He may not be in the same shutdown league as Darrelle Revis (witness him getting beaten deep by speedy DeSean Jackson last Friday night in Philadelphia).

But Talib's importance to the Patriots' defense is significant just the same. In a short time he's come to provide an attitude, a fearlessness and a moxie the Pats didn't have previously. Guys feed off him. You can see it daily.

Plus, his ability to take on the top receivers with man coverage allows the Pats to do more with schemes and blitz packages. Without Talib, they play vanilla. More importantly, without him the secondary becomes a house of cards.

What's further, Talib never allows a sub-par play to throw him off his game. He's just as likely to come back with a big interception or pass breakup a play after getting beat -- an opportunity he was not afforded Friday night, being limited to one series.

Currently there's little or no depth at corner, especially with Alfonzo Dennard's status still up in the air pending court appearances on a possible violation of his parole.

The Pats have enough trouble as it is defending the pass. Without Talib you might as well shove them right back down in the bottom of the league.

His value is not lost on an NFL Network analyst, Solomon Wilcots.

"During that AFC championship game, he had Anquan Boldin tied up. If he stays healthy they could have gone to the Super Bowl. The game changed," said Wilcots, a former defensive back, of Talib in a recent conversation.

"This guy is fearless. He doesn't twitch against the top receivers in the league. He's got that kind of swagger. That's why it was vitally important they brought him back. He makes their secondary totally different. He's a special player.

"When you talk to real good scouts in the league they'll tell you he's the type of player who's born, not made. You can't make those guys. They're just born. Period."

OK, count another vote for Talib.

Heath Evans, a former Patriots fullback and another NFl Network analyst, cast a different vote. When posed with the question, he jumped on the Wilfork bandwagon.

Former Patriots tight end Christian Fauria also went with Wilfork, then gave an honorable mention to linebacker Rob Ninkovich.

"I'd probably lean toward Vince, being a knee-jerk reaction based on they don't have a lot of depth on the D-line," the WBZ analyst said.

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors

Further Discussion

Here at we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)