It is fitting, perhaps, that the latest controversy to rattle the LePage administration involved ill-advised, injudicious and just plain obnoxious comments by a state official. The official was not the governor himself, not this time, but Paul LePage has no one but himself to blame when a member of his Cabinet goes out in public and insults the people he’s supposed to be serving.

To LePage’s credit, he sent Philip Congdon packing after the now-ex-economic development commissioner reportedly demeaned minorities and the parenting skills of Maine residents during appearances in Aroostook County last month. And, certainly, LePage hasn’t said anything remotely as offensive as the remarks attributed to Congdon.

But the governor has recklessly established a culture of so-called “straight talk” that more often than not manifests itself in outrageous pronouncements and hurtful wisecracks that leave many Mainers at least shaking their heads and sometimes shaking their fists. No one should be surprised that a member of his administration might draw the conclusion that it’s acceptable to stand in front of an audience and blurt out whatever moronic thought jumps into his head.

We won’t even ask why someone who has such thoughts would be chosen to occupy a high-profile position – or any position – in state government. LePage says Congdon was “vetted” before his nomination to serve in the Cabinet.

Not enough, apparently.

Unfortunately, the problems with LePage’s administration go beyond his own or his appointees’ loose lips. It’s beginning to look as though LePage may not be up to the job.

The announcement of Congdon’s resignation showed up in an emailed press release about “staff changes” that also revealed the resignation of Darryl Brown as commissioner of the Department of Environmental Protection. Brown stepped down because of a conflict of interest that disqualified him from legally holding the job.

Was he “vetted” before he was chosen for the job? Maybe the next person who should resign from this administration is the “vetter” who gave thumbs-up to these appointees.

LePage refused to accept defeat on Brown, immediately appointing him to head the State Planning Office. The governor said the law that forced Brown out of his previous job was “poorly written” and should be changed. Brown called the law “silliness.”

With all the mistakes LePage has made, you might think he’d eventually apologize for one – or at least admit one.

Not on Brown. And not on Congdon; the governor refused to elaborate on Congdon’s departure or criticize his alleged comments, dismissing the whole mess as a personnel matter.

LePage’s repeated refusals to take responsibility for bad decisions or apologize for offending the people who pay his salary exacerbate the difficulties he’s had getting his administration up and running.

Is he so arrogant and egotistical that he sincerely believes he’s never wrong? Or is he so insecure and uncomfortable with his out-of-nowhere rise from small-city mayor to governor that he’s afraid to admit his limitations?

Perhaps he’s worried that any show of weakness, any concession to his critics, will unleash a pent-up storm of self-doubt that will leave him overwhelmed and helpless in a job that even he may not have thought he’d win when he started running for governor.

We’ll leave the amateur psychology to others, but the overriding problem must be addressed. LePage’s gubernatorial campaign succeeded at least in part because he sold himself as a tough-minded businessman.

His experience in the private sector managing Marden’s discount stores appealed to voters who wanted to restore fiscal sanity to the operation of state government, and it seemed logical that a man who had run a successful business could easily adapt those skills to running the state.

The “easily” part is already off the table. If the transition from businessman to state chief executive were going to be easy, LePage would have made it by now, more than 100 days into the job.

It’s possible that LePage’s personality and skill set are simply a mismatch with the demands of the governorship, which means we’re in for a long four years. But it’s also possible that he’s capable of growing into the job – we’re desperately hoping that he is – which means that what he needs at the moment is some expert help.

For the most part, the governor has surrounded himself with people who, like him, are novices to state government. He has filled his administration with people he is comfortable with, politically and personally, and excluded those who could augment his get-tough philosophy with experience, expertise and an occasional dash of common sense.

LePage doesn’t seem to take advice from anyone, much less from newspaper editorials, but we’ll offer some anyway.

The governor should recruit at least one adviser who can point him in the right direction, warn him when he’s about to make a mistake, counsel him when he’s in trouble. Maybe he could solicit advice from some former governors or other public officials – and act on it.

Maybe he could bring someone into the governor’s office who would function as the chief operating officer to carry out LePage’s policy ideas, many of which are perfectly legitimate and could benefit the state immensely.

LePage would have to swallow his pride to do it – or face up to his insecurities – but seeking the right kind of help could rescue his administration from what looks for all the world like a relentless march toward disaster.

He wouldn’t be the first governor, or president, or CEO, to realize that he was in over his head and needed to eat some humble pie to save himself. And he just might save the rest of us in the process.


Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or to participate in the conversation. Here’s why.

Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.