Legislation to make it unlawful for state officials to leave their jobs and immediately go to work for industries they regulated – the so-called “revolving door” – is one of several ethics bills expected to be debated in the Legislature this session.

Rep. Adam Goode, D-Bangor, has sponsored legislation requiring executive employees “in a major policy-influencing position” to wait one year before accepting a job with “a business activity that is regulated by the state or quasi-state agency by which the former executive employee was employed.”

Goode said he decided to sponsor the legislation after reading a national report last spring that gave Maine an “F” for its poor anti-corruption measures. Among the problems described in the report was the fact that Maine had no laws regulating revolving door employment for executive branch officials.

The story cited a case in 2007-2008, when Maine’s chief utilities regulator, Kurt Adams, negotiated for and accepted a job offer from a wind power developer while still head of his agency – and when the developer had business before the agency.

Adams left his job as the head of the state’s Public Utilities Commission in May 2008 to work for First Wind.

But the prospects are fading for comprehensive ethics legislation during the first half of the two-year legislative session — a promise held out by leading lawmakers after publication of the ethics report.

“The budget’s going to take a lot of the air out of the room,” said Michael Cianchette, Gov. Paul LePage’s legal counsel. “I think obviously there’s a lot of challenges facing the state right now and while this is certainly important, the nature of the fiscal reality of the state has taken most people’s attention. It’s much more of a crisis.”

Last year’s ethics report, the State Integrity Investigation, was based on research into 14 categories, from procurement to campaign disclosure to lobbying. No state got an A, leading the report’s sponsors to conclude, “statehouses remain ripe for self dealing and corruption.”

Maine got an F in nine of the 14 categories, including executive accountability, public access to information, civil service management, pension fund management, the insurance commission, legislative accountability, lobbying disclosure, ethics enforcement and redistricting.

Goode said stories about the report led him to introduce his bill.

“I’m not a big person for putting in a lot of bills,” said Goode. “But I felt reading that story, I wouldn’t want the legislature to project that image.”

In response to the report, both LePage and then-Rep. Emily Cain, D-Orono, vowed to pursue omnibus ethics reform.

Now, said Cain, who was elected to the Senate last November, “I think it would be a mistake to try to do everything at once, because I believe we would end up settling for less and have a less in-depth conversation.”

Cain wants, instead, to focus during this part of the session on legislative and executive branch financial disclosure, conflicts of interest and “transparency” — public access to the workings of government.

“To me, the best approach is to pick a handful of very clear opportunities to make improvements,” said Cain. “Over the next year, I hope to raise the level of conversation … so that we’re not just having a conversation about fixing a problem, but how can we do this better?”

LePage has scaled back his reform ambitions to “something manageable,” according to Cianchette.

The focus will be expanding financial disclosure for legislators and executive branch employees so that ownership interests are disclosed as well as specific ranges of income.

Rep. Goode’s bill also expands requirements for reporting of legislators’ and executive branch employees’ finances.

The purpose of that kind of expanded disclosure, said Cianchette, is to allow citizens to scrutinize the finances of officials and “make informed decisions about the way their personal holdings influence political votes.”

Cianchette said that the limited approach makes sense because, despite the “F” in the national survey, Maine’s not plagued by corruption.

“For the most part, Maine’s still Maine and people know what’s going on and there haven’t been massive scandals like in other states when it comes to this type of disclosure,” said Cianchette.

The groups that sponsored the study explained why states like Maine, not known for corruption, got bad grades.

The study “does not rely on a simple tally of scandals. Rather, it measures the strength of laws and practices that encourage openness and deter corruption. … States with well-known scandals often have the tough laws and enforcement that bring them to light. ‘Quiet’ states may be at a higher risk, with few means to surface corrupt practices.”

Goode said, “We either don’t have strong laws because we don’t have problems to merit them, or we don’t know what the problems are because we don’t have strong enough laws,” he said.

Both Cianchette and Cain said they wanted to work together to ensure bipartisan support for the ethics reform bills. Cianchette said he expected that Cain would sponsor the governor’s bill.

The Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting is a nonpartisan, non-profit news service based in Hallowell. Email: [email protected] Web: pinetreewatchdog.org.

Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or to participate in the conversation. Here’s why.

Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.