In Virginia, the rule is for some restaurants to have four health inspections every year.

In Massachusetts, the standard is twice a year, a frequency considered to be the national average.

In Georgia, restaurants have to post health inspection reports next to their front doors, and in St. Louis, Mo., every restaurant must post a letter grade from its last inspection or face a $500 fine.

In Maine, meanwhile, restaurants are supposed to get routine inspections once every two years. And neither the restaurant nor the state is required to tell patrons whether a restaurant has passed or failed — unless they ask.

Maine’s requirement for inspecting restaurants once every two years is among the least restrictive policies in the nation. New Hampshire and Vermont, on the other hand, have no statewide requirements for the frequency of inspections written into law.

Both New England neighbors have at least some inspection results posted online by regulatory authorities, however. Maine is one of three states that do not.


Comparing states in regard to restaurant cleanliness, sanitation standards and transparency can be difficult. Many don’t have uniform statewide policies for performing inspections or reporting results, and rules are instead set by individual counties or cities. And, regardless of what the policies require in various states, it’s hard to say whether inspectors are adhering to them.

Rules for how often restaurants are inspected vary from “on a routine basis” in Vermont to four times per year in Virginia.

Within many states, inspection duties are divvied up among state, county and municipal agencies. While policies often differ from one town to the next, almost all of the agencies require at least an annual inspection, according to a Portland Press Herald/Maine Sunday Telegram analysis of state programs.

However, with recent cuts to health departments, the rules don’t necessarily reflect what’s actually happening around the country, said University of Illinois professor Mark Dworkin, who is overseeing a study on the effectiveness of frequent inspections.

“It’s highly likely that there are many local health departments that cannot keep up with their policy,” he said.

In Maine, five municipalities — Portland, South Portland, Lewiston, Auburn and Lisbon — do their own inspections, but the whole state follows the same general policy, which was changed last year to require biannual inspections because the agencies couldn’t keep up with the annual requirement.


Falling behind on inspections is not enough reason for the New Mexico Environment Department to loosen its rules, said Steve Zappe, manager of the state’s food program, which is having trouble inspecting all restaurants every year.

“We’re not going there. We’re not going to lower the standard,” he said.

In Manchester, N.H., inspections are required every six months and inspectors don’t fall behind, said Tim Soucy, health director for the state’s largest city.

Manchester is one of 16 cities and towns in New Hampshire that do their own health inspections.

The rest are covered by the New Hampshire Division of Public Health, which doesn’t have a strict policy but tries to inspect each restaurant at least every couple of years, said Mike Dumond, chief of the Bureau of Public Health Protection.

The state set up an online database to post inspection results, but it has been down since last fall because of technical problems, Dumond said. Manchester also has its own inspection records available online.


Most states do not post all inspection results online, but they’re available in at least some city or county — and in many cases, several of them. Three states — Maine, Hawaii and Minnesota — do not have any results available online, according to a list compiled by Food Safety News.

Hawaii, however, recently adopted a Web-based inspection system and will open it to the public when more data have been entered, said Peter Oshiro, director of the sanitation branch in the state’s Department of Health.

The department is also moving toward inspecting restaurants three times a year instead of every two years or less, which Oshiro called “totally unacceptable.” In addition, it has proposed requiring restaurants to post green, yellow or red placards with inspection results for customers to see.

Cities or counties in at least a dozen states, not including Maine, require inspection results or cleanliness letter grades to hang in a conspicuous place inside restaurants.

In Georgia, the most recent inspection report must be “prominently displayed” within 15 feet of the main entrance and between 5 and 7 feet from the ground, according to the state’s food service rules.

A city ordinance in St. Louis requires each restaurant to post a decal with a letter grade from its inspection. Establishments face a $500 fine and downgrading if the decal is defaced, hidden or removed.


In Maine, the rules require only that restaurants provide their latest inspection reports to customers who ask to see them. Reports also can be requested from the state.

Leslie Bridgers can be contacted at 791-6364 or at


Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.

Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.