HARTFORD, Conn. — Most of the families of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting victims want a recent Connecticut law barring the release of certain crime records to be expanded to include other materials including 911 audio tapes, according to an attorney representing 22 of the 26 families who lost relatives in the shooting.

Morgan Rueckert said Wednesday the families worry about the sounds captured Dec. 14 in 911 phone calls being heard by the public, including their other children.

“It’s very hard in this case because the grief and the fear and the anguish is so overwhelming and they very much fear the perpetuation of that,” he said.

Rueckert, a Hartford attorney who said he’s not charging the families, testified before a state task force developing recommendations to the General Assembly on balancing victim privacy with the public’s right to know. It comes as state prosecutors say they will appeal a recent order by the state Freedom of Information Commission to release the Newtown 911 tapes.

In June, Connecticut lawmakers passed legislation that prevents the public release of crime scene photos and video evidence depicting a homicide victim if those records could constitute an “unwarranted invasion of personal privacy” of the victim or the victim’s surviving family members. The new law also created a one-year moratorium on the release of certain portions of audiotape and other recordings in which the condition of a homicide victim is described. The exemption did not include 911 emergency call recordings, however.

Rueckert said those same protections should be extended to 911 audio tapes, should they constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. He said surrounding states have similar language in their open-records laws.

Advertisement

Several media representatives and open-government advocates, however, urged the panel on Wednesday not to recommend further restrictions on Connecticut’s Freedom of Information Act, arguing that such information can be crucial for journalists’ investigations, whether the material is published or not. They warned that more restrictions on public access to records could have unintended consequences.

Klarn DePalma, chairman of the Connecticut Broadcasters Association, said today’s viewers are demanding investigative journalism.

Various editors said their news outlets take great pains to review material and consider if it’s appropriate before publishing it.

But Rueckert said times have changed and while the professional media have standards, the Internet has provided others with the ability to publish crime scene photos and other materials that could be considered inappropriate for a newspaper or TV station to use.


Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.

Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.