A Dec. 31 article on the Maine Public Utilities Commission (“Bill seeks to avoid conflicts that paralyze Maine PUC”) included this statement:

“In September, the PUC was the subject of a critical report from the Legislature’s independent watchdog agency, the Office of Program Evaluation and Government Accountability. The report identified problems with the commission, including a public perception that the commissioners and staff have a bias toward the utilities, for which many of them have worked.”

I worked on the PUC’s technical staff for 18 years, from 1988 until 2006. No commissioner during that time – and none since – worked for a Maine public utility.

I can think of only two staff members who worked for Central Maine Power; I worked on CMP cases with both of them and they never showed a scintilla of bias toward CMP, or any toward any other utility. I know of no other current PUC staffers who have worked for a Maine public utility, or who ever demonstrated a bias toward a utility.

I was a professional mathematician for 46 years and worked for several companies. None matched the PUC staff members I worked with for professionalism, competence and dedication.

Thus, I would like to know what the basis was of the “public perception” the Legislature’s “watchdog agency” used to conclude PUC commissioners and their staff “have a bias toward the utilities” and that “many of them have worked” for them.

James Douglas Cowie



Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.

Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.