On April 3, the Press Herald published “Our View: Highway signs are not supposed to be advertisements,” an argument for removing or relocating a number of the brown signs along Interstate 95 that direct travelers to specific points of interest.
Among the signs mentioned was the one for the Shaker Village in Gray. This point of view was clearly endorsed by the Legislature, which has passed the law making these changes.
Now comes your Editor of Anger, Bill Nemitz, making a plea for the Shaker Village (“Shakers seek special designation on Maine Turnpike signs,” June 18). Where was he in April? And why is the Shaker Village any different from others similarly affected?
Michael A. Smith
Wells
Send questions/comments to the editors.
Related Stories
Latest Articles
Success. Please wait for the page to reload. If the page does not reload within 5 seconds, please refresh the page.
Enter your email and password to access comments.
Hi, to comment on stories you must . This profile is in addition to your subscription and website login.
Already have a commenting profile? .
Invalid username/password.
Please check your email to confirm and complete your registration.
Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.
Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.