Maine has a proud history of bipartisan Clean Election participation: In 2012, 70 percent of legislators were Clean Election candidates. Thirteen states provide some public financing options for campaigns.
“Dark money” hides in 501(c)(4)s – “social welfare” nonprofits. Ironically, corporations that hide donors in this social welfare structure refer to those who regulate fairness and funding of Clean Election candidates as favoring “political welfare.”
A hundred years ago, “welfare” spoke to the well-being of a particular group of people. And 501(c)(4)s were established to protect and/or improve socially disenfranchised people – not to protect wealthy citizens.
Campaign-funding laws exist to protect political systems from oligarchy and avoid legalizing politician bribery. Transparency of large donors is critical to keeping our representative democracy. Voters and Clean Election candidates appreciate the ethics of the law.
If you favor keeping Maine the leader in protecting the integrity of Clean Elections, “Yes on 1” is the answer.
Jarryl Larson
Edgecomb
Send questions/comments to the editors.
Success. Please wait for the page to reload. If the page does not reload within 5 seconds, please refresh the page.
Enter your email and password to access comments.
Hi, to comment on stories you must . This profile is in addition to your subscription and website login.
Already have a commenting profile? .
Invalid username/password.
Please check your email to confirm and complete your registration.
Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.
Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.