In the aftermath of the 2014 Portland fire that killed six young people, the trial of the building’s landlord, Gregory Nisbet, has been a landmark event – and the reaction to Nisbet’s acquittal last week on manslaughter charges in the deaths has been correspondingly intense.

But while people may differ over whether the verdict was fair, it’s indisputable that Maine has a statewide shortage of safe, affordable housing, and Mainers’ lives depend on government using all available tools to resolve this critical need.

The three-story Noyes Street duplex that burned Nov. 1, 2014, was reportedly in rough shape, its overall condition a factor in complaints from neighbors and multiple inspections by city officials before the fire.

Smoke detectors were missing or disabled. Former residents testified that there was no alternate way out of the building from the bedrooms on the third floor, where three people died. The secondary exit from the second floor was blocked, according to survivors whose trial testimony included harrowing descriptions of making their way through smoke and heat to escape via a second-story window.

Why would anyone have chosen to live in such a rundown place? By all accounts, Nisbet was a laid-back landlord who didn’t press tenants to pay the rent on time, making him a viable option in a city with a lot of low-wage service-sector jobs and few available rental units.

To address the city’s affordable-housing shortage, Portland has enacted an ordinance that requires developers of market-rate housing to set aside units for moderate-income tenants or pay into an affordable-housing fund. In exchange, developers get incentives such as increased density, a reduction in fees or tax breaks for their projects.

But this is a problem that’s far bigger than Portland. In each county in Maine, according to a study of fair-market rents, people are paying anywhere from half to two-thirds of their monthly income for a place to live. And many of these places are probably as rundown as the Noyes Street property was, given the advanced age of Maine’s housing stock.

The housing pinch hasn’t gone unnoticed at the state level. Legislators voted earlier this year to streamline the process of applying for housing assistance. But getting help covering the cost of a rental unit doesn’t do much good if there are no places available to rent. To develop workable solutions, like Portland’s inclusionary-zoning ordinance, government must recognize that the free market isn’t equipped to provide enough safe, affordable housing in the places where it’s needed.

Every Maine resident deserves access to well-kept housing that doesn’t drain their budget. Officials in Maine’s largest city have taken a step in the right direction toward this goal – now policy makers in Augusta should follow suit.


Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.

Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.