In his letter supporting proficiency-based learning (March 24), I believe Peter Gore confuses proficiency-based learning with project-based learning.
In project-based learning, students study core subjects and use that knowledge to create original projects in which they, to use Mr. Gore’s words, “communicate well, work collaboratively, problem-solve and think critically.”
Proficiency-based learning, on the other hand, has yet to be defined. The state mandated a proficiency-based diploma stating that students had to gain proficiency in eight subjects, but never defined proficiency or what proficiency-based learning would look like.
If the law results in districts improving curricula, then it will have served some purpose. However, rather than spending time and money on the testing, retesting and data collection that the law requires, we should be supporting professional development to update curriculum.
Let’s repeal this ill-conceived experiment and instead work with districts to develop a world-class curriculum for all of Maine’s students.
Kathleen Mikulka
Elders for Future Generations (eldersforthefuture.com)
Cape Elizabeth
-
BusinessLobster industry's struggles overseas add urgency to driving up demand in U.S.
-
EditorialsOur View: U.S. retreats amid misery of global refugee crisis
-
Letters
Letter to the editor: Views of women who weren't assaulted are a weak Kavanaugh defense
-
Letters
Letter to the editor: Collins must ask court nominee hard questions or she will be voted out
-
LettersLetter to the editor: Mills undercuts workers by fighting tribal rights to protect water quality
