As a citizen of Portland for more than 30 years, during which I taught at the Maine College of Art, I read with interest your article about the Bayside neighborhood hitting “rock bottom,” and the letters that followed a week later, in the May 13 Maine Sunday Telegram.
What strikes me about the debate over Preble Street and the Oxford Street Shelter is that everyone seems generally to agree that people in need should be helped, and I personally think it’s noble that Portland wishes to continue to be compassionate. But I don’t see why moving the shelters out of downtown constitutes a lack of compassion.
Services can be rendered without them occurring where they currently are. Furthermore, this would allow Portlanders to extend compassion to homeowners in the Bayside neighborhood, to children at nearby schools (who currently witness more than they should) and to tourists, who are often the target of aggressive panhandling. Why isn’t “compassion for all” the best approach?
Dana Sawyer
Portland and Blue Hill
Send questions/comments to the editors.
Success. Please wait for the page to reload. If the page does not reload within 5 seconds, please refresh the page.
Enter your email and password to access comments.
Hi, to comment on stories you must . This profile is in addition to your subscription and website login.
Already have a commenting profile? .
Invalid username/password.
Please check your email to confirm and complete your registration.
Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.
Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.