FALMOUTH — Trustees of Falmouth Memorial Library say they need $1 million more than the $5.6 million already allocated to complete a long-planned renovation and expansion.

Marsha Clark, president of the library board of trustees, blamed unexpectedly high construction costs for the updated price tag. She said last week that the best solution to the shortfall would be a bond on the November municipal ballot to authorize borrowing more than the $2.81 million already approved by voters.

Clark told the Town Council the library built in an inflation factor of 5 percent when determining how much money would be needed to double the size of the building at the corner of Depot and Lunt roads. But when the board went out to bid this summer, it was shocked at how much the costs had increased for every aspect of the project. In some cases, Clark said, they were more than 100 percent greater than initially projected.

In addition, she said testing at the site has shown soils are poor and the stormwater management plan will have to be more robust, which also added to the cost.

Town Manager Nathan Poore said his rough estimate is that borrowing another $1 million could add 3 cents per $1,000 of valuation to the property tax rate in town.

Voters approved borrowing $2.81 million for the project in 2014, predicated on the library privately raising the other $2.81 million. At the end of last year the library announced it had raised its share.


Since then it has received site plan approval and completed required construction documents.

Clark said trustees have been working to reduce the cost of the project without affecting its integrity. She said $1.2 million was cut from the project, but that still left $1 million outstanding.

While councilors were sympathetic last week, they also expressed concern. Councilor Aaron Svedlow said “that’s a big number” and argued the community has already been stretched to the limit to raise the initial $5.6 million.

“There’s a lot about this that doesn’t sit right,” Svedlow said. “There needs to be more thought and changes put into this.”

Scott Simons, the project architect, said everything possible has been done to reduce costs without sacrificing programming. “Nobody saw this huge inflationary hit coming. This is my worst nightmare,” he said.

“We did not consider this bond request lightly,” Clark said. “We talked about so many things, nothing was off the table.”


She said trustees considered a new site, but that would come with acquisition costs. They also thought about tearing down the existing building, rather than renovating and expanding it, but that also had drawbacks.

Clark said the board also looked into doing a smaller addition, but said “anything smaller does not fit our needs. Many years ago we agreed the optimal size was between 18,000 and 22,000 square feet.”

The project plans call for adding another 8,000 square feet of space, which would leave the library with an overall footprint of 18,000 square feet, “so we’re already at the lower end of what’s considered optimal,” she said.

The goal of the library project is to create a separate youth services wing, new community seating areas, a separate reading room and increased access to computers and other technology, among other upgrades.

Clark said the urgency behind requesting a bond referendum this fall is that the current building is failing.

“We had to close several times last year” due to deficient systems, she said Monday.


Poore said time is limited for the council to put a bond question on the ballot in November. Councilors would have to make a final decision no later than their Sept. 10 meeting.

Councilors asked the library to come back Aug. 13 with more details about what has been done to shave costs, what can be done to raise additional money from grants or other funding sources, and possibly new options for saving money.

The council also agreed to open the issue up to public comment at its next meeting, which is not usually allowed on non-voting items.

Kate Irish Collins can be contacted at 710-2336 or at:

[email protected]

Twitter: KIrishCollins

Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.

Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.