WASHINGTON — The woman who has accused Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault decades ago wants the FBI to investigate her allegation before she testifies to the Senate Judiciary Committee – a demand that came as President Trump and Senate Republicans increasingly rallied to the defense of the embattled Supreme Court nominee.

“A full investigation by law enforcement officials will ensure that the crucial facts and witnesses in this matter are assessed in a non-partisan manner, and that the committee is fully informed before conducting any hearing or making any decisions,” lawyers for the woman, Christine Blasey Ford, said in a letter to the panel late Tuesday.

The committee had invited Kavanaugh and Ford to testify at a public hearing Monday, but Ford’s response raises questions about whether Republicans will proceed with the session and ultimately press ahead with a vote on Kavanaugh, who was nominated to replace the retired Justice Anthony Kennedy in July. The two-page letter does not explicitly say she will not attend if there is no FBI probe.

Many Republican officials said Tuesday that such a hearing would be Kavanaugh’s best chance at preserving his nomination to the high court, since it would give the judge – who seems determined to fight the allegation – an opportunity to respond to the claims. But Democrats, like Ford, argued that the scheduled Monday session should be delayed until the FBI further investigates her allegation. The high-stakes hearing was set without consulting Ford in advance.

The letter from Ford’s lawyers described death threats and harassment since The Washington Post published her account Sunday.

“In the 36 hours since her name became public, Dr. Ford has received a stunning amount of support from her community and from fellow citizens across our country. At the same time, however, her worst fears have materialized,” the letter said. “She has been the target of vicious harassment and even death threats. As a result of these kind of threats, her family was forced to relocate out of their home. Her email has been hacked, and she has been impersonated online.”


The letter also refers to Ford testifying “at the same table” as Kavanaugh, although a spokesman for Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, said it was never the plan, nor was it conveyed to Ford and her attorneys, to have them testify together.

The FBI declined to comment Tuesday after the letter was made public. The Justice Department said previously that the FBI updated Kavanaugh’s background-check file to include the allegation and suggested that is the extent of what the agency plans to do.

Earlier, Democrats also protested Republicans’ decision to limit the witnesses at Monday’s hearing to just Ford and Kavanaugh, saying it would turn the testimony into a “he said, she said” spectacle.

At a White House news conference Tuesday afternoon, Trump encouraged the hearing to proceed so Ford can “state her case,” but he predicted that the public setting would ultimately exonerate Kavanaugh and expressed sympathy for his nominee.

“I feel so badly for him that he’s going through this,” Trump said. “. . . This is not a man that deserves this.”

He called Kavanaugh “a great gentleman” and lamented that his wife and daughters are experiencing the public airing of accusations that Trump said Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., should have brought up earlier in his confirmation process. Feinstein, the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, has said she kept the accusations confidential at Ford’s request.


Though Kavanaugh’s confirmation prospects looked shaky earlier this week after Ford’s allegations became public, senior Republicans on Tuesday were increasingly determined to press forward with his nomination.

“All I can say is that we’re bringing this to a close,” said Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C. “They’ve had tons of time to do this. This has been a drive-by shooting when it comes to Kavanaugh. . . . I’ll listen to the lady, but we’re going to bring this to a close.”

Sen. Rob Portman, R-Ohio, a close Kavanaugh friend who introduced him at his confirmation hearings this month, said, “Obviously, the process was very unfair.” He added: “I’m not blaming [Ford], I’m blaming the Democrats who misused this process.”

And Sen. John Cornyn, Texas, the No. 2 Republican in the Senate, sharply questioned Ford’s credibility. Speaking to reporters, Cornyn said he was concerned by “gaps” in the account of Ford, who told The Washington Post that, at a house party in the early 1980s when the two were in high school, Kavanaugh drunkenly pinned her to a bed, groped her and put his hand over her mouth to stifle her screams.

“The problem is, Dr. Ford can’t remember when it was, where it was or how it came to be,” Cornyn told reporters at the Capitol.

Asked whether he was questioning the accuser’s account, Cornyn said, “There are some gaps there that need to be filled.”


In another part of the dispute, Democrats insisted that Mark Judge, a Kavanaugh friend from their time at Georgetown Preparatory School, should appear before the panel to testify about the alleged incident.

Republicans “have just completely tried to ram this thing through,” said Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., a former chairman of the committee. “This is more of the same.”

Judge, who Ford said was in the room at the time of the alleged assault, said in a letter to the committee that he did not wish to speak publicly. In the letter, relayed by his attorney, Judge said that he has “no memory of this alleged incident.”

“Brett Kavanaugh and I were friends in high school, but I do not recall the party described in Dr. Ford’s letter,” Judge said. “More to the point, I never saw Brett act in the manner Dr. Ford describes.”

Republican staffers on the Judiciary Committee continued reaching out to other potential witnesses mentioned in The Post’s report Sunday, as Kavanaugh visited the White House for the second day in a row Tuesday. Trump said he had not spoken to him.

It was unclear whether Monday’s hearing would take place if Ford formally turns down the committee’s invitation. Cornyn said that if Ford “doesn’t want to participate, then we can’t force her.” A committee vote on Kavanaugh, initially scheduled for Thursday but subsequently canceled, could occur “a couple days” after that hearing, Cornyn said.


A furious Feinstein said it was “impossible to take this process seriously,” noting that 22 witnesses appeared at a hearing in 1991 when law professor Anita Hill accused Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas of sexual harassment. Pressed about that precedent, Grassley shot back: “You’re talking about history. We’re not looking back. We’re looking forward.”

The charged political dynamics ahead of November’s midterm elections hovered as some Democrats running for re-election in states won by Trump in 2016 shied away from reporters, as did some moderate Republicans worried about potentially alienating independent voters and women.

Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., was first elected in the 1992 “year of the woman” following the 1991 hearings for Thomas. She said Republicans risk another Democratic surge if they aggressively target Kavanaugh’s accuser.

“They’re on very fragile ground,” Murray said. “If women and men believe someone who has courageously come forward isn’t being treated fairly, there will be a reaction, you can count on that. . . . If she’s victimized at this hearing for a second time in her life, there will a huge reaction. . . . They don’t want to see another woman silenced or demeaned for coming forward.”

More than 140 female friends of Ford signed a letter Tuesday defending the Palo Alto University professor and her character. “Christine’s bravery and sacrifice in coming forward with her story while knowing the all-but-certain to follow devastating consequences for and retaliation against her and family does not surprise those of us who know her,” the letter read. “We are all very proud of Christine, grateful to have her as a member of our community, and stand in solidarity with her.”

While many Republicans remain confident that Kavanaugh will be confirmed, there have been private discussions among some lawmakers about whether the GOP should have a backup plan if he withdraws from the process or fails to secure the necessary votes.

But any private skepticism was outweighed by public vows to stand by Kavanaugh as he fought the allegation.

“He’s not going to withdraw,” Cornyn insisted. “I talked to him yesterday, and he’s determined to testify and tell his side of the story.”

He added, “Our Plan B is the same as our Plan A: Judge Kavanaugh.”

Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.

Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.