I’m going to vote “no” on universal home care (Question 1) for two reasons.
First: The referendum is presented as an enticing free lunch to the over 90 percent of Maine wage earners who earn less than the Social Security wage limit and who, therefore, will not pay for the program. Charging 3.8 percent tax on income above $128,400 is not “free.” It might be a barrier to jobs moving to Maine. Or even were it a reasonable, progressive funding scheme, it won’t achieve its aim of universal home care.
Second: Nearly 90 percent of Americans who need long-term care receive it from informal, unpaid caregivers, i.e., family and friends. Creating a pool of money to hire caregivers will likely attract more paid caregivers, but it won’t expand the amount of care available. Ask yourself: If Mom can get care for free, why not take the kids away overnight instead of taking care of her?
This proposal will not achieve its objective and may well make matters worse.
William Rosenberg
Mount Vernon
Send questions/comments to the editors.
-
The ForecasterCooking at the Cove: Make this pasta a summertime staple
-
The ForecasterCoastal History: Moosehead Lake holds a bit of Bath Iron Works’ DNA
-
The ForecasterSande’s Picks: Harvest on the Harbor a fabulous food fest
-
PoliticsTrump tells NRA chief that universal background checks are off the table
-
Cops & CourtsState police search for Litchfield man in connection with reported kidnapping
