BRUNSWICK — Walmart believes it’s being over-taxed in Brunswick and has asked for a reduction in the valuation of its store near Cook’s Corner.

The world’s biggest retailer has asked Brunswick to slash its taxable value by nearly $7 million for 2017 on the grounds that the building’s $16.9 million assessed value “exceeds the property’s fair market value.” The nearly 41 percent reduction in value would cost Brunswick about $128,000 in tax revenue.

Brunswick had hired Massachusetts firm KRT Appraisal to do a comprehensive revaluation of all residential, commercial and industrial properties in 2017. Before the revaluation, Walmart’s assessed property value was about $8.9 million, Brunswick Assessor Nick Cloutier said.

Walmart has appealed property tax valuations throughout the United States , including at least eight locations in Maine: Thomaston, Sanford, Windham, Biddeford, Waterville, Ellsworth, Bangor and Houlton.

“This is part of a very broad effort, where they go around the country challenging property tax valuations,” said Stephen Langsdorf, Brunswick town attorney.

The retailer has hired Stavitsky and Associates, a New Jersey-based law firm, to handle the filings in Brunswick.


In 2017, then-Brunswick Assessor Cathy Jamison denied the company’s request for an abatement. At the time, Walmart claimed the property was worth only about $10 million, citing a Walmart appraisal that Langsdorf said was “very, very flawed.”

Walmart then appealed to the local board of assessors, which also denied the request, before then appealing to the state board of assessment for review, Town Manager John Eldridge told the town council on Monday. The state appeals process requires that the parties attempt to reach a mediated solution, which is i the works.

The town has hired Stephen Traub, an independent appraiser to appraise the retailer’s property at 15 Tibbett’s Drive, Eldridge said. The appraisal, at a cost of $6,500 to $10,000, is scheduled for Monday.

Walmart also filed a separate 2018-2019 abatement request this spring, arguing that the $16.9 million assessment “exceeds the property’s fair market value,” which it pegged at $11.2 million, $1.2 million more than the 2017 request. If granted, Walmart would pay about $212,000 in annual property taxes, rather than the $320,000 it paid in 2018. Cloutier denied the request and Walmart has 60 days to file an appeal.

“This is pretty customary for large businesses” to contest property valuations, he said.

The company says that its conflict with towns such as Brunswick is necessary to ensure it operates in an efficient and profitable manner.


“Fair property taxation is critical to our efficient operation and ability to save our customers money, and we strive to work directly and collaboratively with local jurisdictions to reach a fair market value,” said Delia Garcia, senior director of communications for Walmart. “The challenge is that fair market value changes, and based on current market conditions we believe the value of the property (in Brunswick) is lower than the assessed amount.

“Similar to other Maine businesses and residents, we are simply seeking a fair market value for the taxation of our stores.”

The trend is mirrored across other Maine communities.

The Ellsworth American reported that Walmart filed an abatement request for the 2017 tax year asking the property value of the store be cut from $20.1 million to $10 million, which would have cost the town $158,000 in annual property tax revenue.

Last year, The Advertiser Democrat reported that Oxford officials denied a request lowering the value from $11.5 million to $8 million, which would have reduced the company’s taxes by $52,000.

In Thomaston, too, the town denied a request for an abatement lowering the assessed value from $15.89 million to $7 million, which the Courier Gazette reported would have meant a $172,000 reduction in taxes.


The Ellsworth American also reported that in 2017, Walmart attorneys filed requests for more than $41 million in tax abatements around the state, not including millions more in appeals for several of its Sam’s Club locations.

Last month, Bangor reached a mediated settlement with Walmart, Town Assessor Philip Drew said Wednesday. They settled on a $17.7 million property value, significantly higher than Walmart’s requested $12.5 million, but lower than the city’s assessed $19 million. The city issued Walmart a $33,500 tax refund.

In Augusta, the process is just getting started. Assessor Lisa Morin said that she denied an abatement request from Walmart on Tuesday that argued the property assessed at $19.5 million is worth only about $13.5 million. If granted, it would lower the location’s tax bill from almost $400,000 to about $283,000. Walmart has approached the city in the past and occasionally slight adjustments have been made, Morin said, but this was the first formal appeal the assessor had received from the company.

Some of these appeals are based on what is known as a “dark store loophole,” which allows big box stores like Walmart, Target and Lowe’s to reduce their property tax value by contending that their fully operational businesses should be assessed the same as vacant buildings.

Langsdorf, however, said that is not a viable argument, as an established, bustling store – like the one in Brunswick – is going to have a higher value than a shuttered building. It is an argument he has seen before, but is one that he does not expect will come into play in Brunswick.

The valuation is further complicated by the fact that when these big box stores move and build a new store – sometimes just a few miles down the road – there are often restrictions in the original deed limiting what can go in that location. For example, a Home Depot may move out and say that it cannot be filled by another home improvement store like Lowe’s, or that a former Walmart cannot be home to another store like Target. This leaves municipalities with not only a potential loss in tax revenue, but also a vacant storefront that is difficult to fill, Morin said.


The operations extend beyond state lines. In 2011, Good Jobs First, a national policy resource center promoting corporate and government accountability in economic development, published a report claiming that Walmart deprives state and local governments of more than $400 million a year through “a variety of tax avoidance schemes.”

“It has extracted more than $1.2 billion in property tax abatements, sales tax rebates, infrastructure and site improvements, and other economic development subsidies from state and local governments around the country,” the report said. “Walmart may be more of a fiscal burden than a benefit to many of the communities in which it operates.”

Walmart is ranked No. 1 in the Fortune 500 and had more than $500 billion in revenue in 2018 and made more than $6.6 billion in profit, according to the magazine. It operates more than 5,000 stores across the U.S.


Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.

Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.