The facts emerging about the recent shooting death in Waterville – suggesting a years-long troubled relationship involving known direct threats to kill the eventual victim made by a man who, his family says, suffers from mental illness, and had multiple guns stored at multiple locations – are chilling. This tragic death of a young mother, reportedly threatened in the presence of the pair’s young children, offers a compelling case for a “red flag” law.
Once a law enforcement officer has probable cause to believe that a person with access to guns could foreseeably kill someone, does endorsement of the officer’s conclusion by a medical officer and then a judicial officer (as required by the compromise “yellow flag” law) justify leaving the intended human target at such a risk?
The Legislature’s failure to enact a “red flag” law earlier this year deprived family, friends and law enforcement of a chance to intervene, and very possibly avoid the killing and trauma that were to come.
Greg Sample
Brunswick
Send questions/comments to the editors.
Success. Please wait for the page to reload. If the page does not reload within 5 seconds, please refresh the page.
Enter your email and password to access comments.
Hi, to comment on stories you must . This profile is in addition to your subscription and website login.
Already have a commenting profile? .
Invalid username/password.
Please check your email to confirm and complete your registration.
Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.
Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.