FLAGSTAFF, Ariz. — A federal judge said he will issue a decision Monday on a request from tribal nations to temporarily halt the distribution of $8 billion in coronavirus relief funding for tribes.

At least 15 Native American tribes across the country, including Maine’s Maliseet Indians, have sued the U.S. Treasury Department, saying the funding should go only to the 574 tribes that have a government-to-government relationship with the U.S., not to Alaska Native corporations.

The Treasury Department has taken the position that the corporations are eligible.

U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta in Washington, D.C., held a hearing Friday on the tribes’ request for a temporary restraining order.

The arguments in court centered on the definition of “Indian Tribe” under the Indian Self Determination and Education Assistance Act, a federal law meant to empower tribes in controlling federal services on their land.

Alaska Native corporations were included in the definition in the CARES Act — the $2.2 trillion relief package signed into law in March.

Advertisement

“Of course the government and the tribes have a difference of opinion on what that definition means,” said Riyaz Kanji, an attorney for the tribes. “It will be the court’s role to resolve that difference.”

Federal agencies don’t have a consistent interpretation either.

Mehta asked various times whether the Treasury Department reasonably could separate Alaska Native corporations that are delivering services to tribes in response to the coronavirus from those that aren’t.

“It ought to be reserved for ANCs in very limited circumstances,” Mehta said.

Kanji said that approach would ignore what the tribes have argued was Congress’ intent — to provide much-needed funding to tribal governments.

Jason Lynch, a Justice Department attorney representing the Treasury Department, said he wasn’t sure because the agency hasn’t determined how it will distribute the funding. No payments will go out before Tuesday — two days past the deadline in the CARES Act, he said.

Regardless, he saw the issue before Mehta as narrow: eligibility. “That question should be answered and should be the only question,” Lynch said.

The corporations are unique to Alaska and own most Native lands in the state under a 1971 settlement among the U.S., Alaska Natives and the state of Alaska.

The tribes that have sued are in California, Washington state, Arizona, New Mexico, Utah, Maine, South Dakota and Alaska.


Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.

Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.

filed under: