The World Health Organization moved Tuesday to clarify its position on whether people without symptoms are widely spreading the new coronavirus, saying much remains unknown about asymptomatic transmission.

A comment by a WHO official on Monday – calling such asymptomatic transmissions “very rare” – touched off a furious scientific debate over the unresolved question and attracted widespread criticism of the organization.

Less than 24 hours later, the WHO convened a special news conference to walk back its comments, stressing that much remains unknown. But the comment from Monday had already spread widely and been seized upon by conservatives and others to bolster arguments that people do not need to wear masks or maintain social distancing precautions.

The episode sparked criticism of the WHO’s public health messaging and highlighted just how fraught and easily politicized such work remains months into the pandemic.

Calling the controversy “a misunderstanding,” Maria Van Kerkhove, head of the WHO’s emerging disease and zoonosis unit, said that during the news conference Monday, she was trying to respond to a journalist’s question when she said asymptomatic transmission was “very rare.”

“I wasn’t stating a policy of WHO or anything like that,” she said. “We do know that some people who are asymptomatic, or some people who do not have symptoms, can transmit the virus on.”


It was not the “intent of WHO to say there is a new or different policy,” added Mike Ryan, head of emergency programs for the WHO. “There is still too much unknown about this virus and still too much unknown about its transmission dynamics.”

While asymptomatic transmission does occur, no one knows for sure how frequently it happens. Studies and models have suggested many of those infected never show symptoms. And it remains an open question whether they are a large force driving transmission. Some countries using contact tracing to work backward from confirmed cases have not found many instances of asymptomatic spread, WHO officials noted.

At the same time, WHO officials acknowledged on Tuesday that some modeling studies have suggested as much as 41% of transmission may be due to asymptomatic people.

Adding to the confusion are differing definitions of what it means to be asymptomatic complicate matters. Some people who are infected never show symptoms – experts would considered those truly asymptomatic cases. But some show symptoms later and could be spreading the virus before those symptoms manifest – they would be considered pre-symptomatic cases.

Further complicating matters is the fact that for some people, symptoms are so mild – or manifest themselves in less expected ways such as diarrhea or muscle aches, instead of the more well-known fever and cough – that people aren’t aware of them until later on.

“It’s a mess. I don’t know why they would say asymptomatic transmission is very rare when the truth is we simply don’t know how frequent it is,” said Eric Topol, a professor of molecular medicine at Scripps Research. “And it doesn’t change the facts we do know, which is that this virus is very transmissible and is very hard to combat.”


The episode highlights how much remains uncertain about the novel virus, the difficulty of communicating that uncertainty, and the desire among the public for any new data to bolster a chosen stance on pandemic response.

The question of whether asymptomatic people are helping drive the virus’s spread is critical – and part of the U.S. government’s stated reasons for directives to engage in social distancing and mask wearing and to impose shutdowns. Because asymptomatic spread is one way some researchers believe the virus is circulating, even people at low risk for the disease or who don’t show symptoms are warned to behave as though they are infected.

With so much still unknown about asymptomatic infection and transmission, many scientists said the WHO was irresponsible to speak so definitively because it can erode people’s willingness to take such precautions.

“In a way, it’s debating semantics because in a practical sense, there is no difference between people who simply haven’t developed symptoms yet and are infecting others, and those who are truly asymptomatic. It looks the same in the early stages,” said Monica Gandhi, an infectious disease expert at the University of California at San Francisco.

Others expressed support for the WHO, noting the difficulty of communicating scientific nuance and uncertainties during the pandemic. Some praise the WHO for continuing – unlike the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the White House – to hold regular briefings to update the public.

“Worth keeping in mind that WHO staff . . . have been running at top speed since early Jan.,” Devi Sridhar, a global public health expert at the University of Edinburgh, said in a tweet. “Doing daily press briefings & assisting countries while under fire from all corners. They must be exhausted like all of us & need some support.”


On Tuesday, CDC officials attributed the controversy to “misinterpretation of a quote from WHO” and confusion among the public between asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic cases. CDC spokesman Scott Pauley said it remains essential that people wear masks. “We know some people without symptoms may be able to spread the virus. That is why measures like cloth face coverings in public are so important.”

It remains unclear, experts say, how asymptomatic transmission may be occurring. In people with symptoms, coughing or sneezing shoots droplets widely. Some have theorized that, in people not showing symptoms, the virus could be spreading through loud talking, singing or shouting.

“I worry that with so much unknown, if we as public health experts overstate asymptomatic transmission as the main reason for policy, it could come back to bite us,” said Jennifer Nuzzo, an epidemiologist at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health’s Center for Health Security. “We are telling people to wear masks, for example, because there is belief it can stop some of the infections. At the same time, we need to be careful not to state things in absolutes and to tell to people we are waiting for more studies.”

There could be reasons to wear masks even if asymptomatic transmission proves to be rare, experts note, because many people aren’t aware of symptoms when they first appear. Masks can also protect wearers from touching their nose and mouth and becoming infected.

In her initial comments, Van Kerkhove didn’t entirely dismiss the occurrence of asymptomatic transmission but said initial unpublished data from contact tracing in some countries suggests it’s rarer than thought. Within minutes, that comment was amplified by some news outlets.

“We have a number of reports from countries who are doing very detailed contact tracing,” Kerkhove said in her initial comments. “They’re following asymptomatic cases. They’re following contacts. And they’re not finding secondary transmission onward. It’s very rare.”


Kerkhove pointed to a document published last week by the WHO that updated guidance on mask wearing based on the latest research. The document cited contact tracing in China that suggests asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic people are “much less likely to transmit the virus than those who develop symptoms.” But those findings are based on sample sizes of fewer than 100 people – not considered rigorous evidence by most scientific standards.

Experts pointed out other problems with the WHO’s initial statement.

“All of the best evidence suggests that people without symptoms can and do readily spread SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes Covid-19,” the Harvard Global Health Institute said in a statement Tuesday. “In fact, some evidence suggests that people may be most infectious in the days before they become symptomatic.”

An influential study published in April in the journal Nature found evidence that people can be very infectious roughly two days before symptoms appear. The study estimated that 44% of infections are coming from people not yet showing symptoms.

Another paper published last week in the Annals of Internal Medicine journal reviewed 16 of the most relevant studies of asymptomatic infection. It found that a likely rate of 40% to 45% of those infected don’t have symptoms. But that paper concluded that every study on the subject has been “imperfect in many ways.” One problem is relying on patients to report symptoms because they are not always aware that the tickle in their throat, for instance, is the onset of the virus.

The ideal study of asymptomatic transmission has yet to be done, said Topol, one of the authors of the Annals paper. Instead of relying on self-reported symptoms, such a study might use genomic sequencing to trace and confirm the exact path of the virus from person to person.

“At this point, we simply don’t know how much asymptomatic transmission happens,” Topol said. “Sometimes, it’s important to just say that.”

Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.

Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.

filed under: