The Jan. 6 Press Herald article describing Northern Light Health’s turn to a for-profit corporation – Optum, which had a $101.3 billion profit in 2019 – for financial help highlights hospitals’ growing financial stresses.

One of the factors contributing to these stresses is the cost of managing billing in our multi-payer system. According to an article in BMC Health Services Research, 8.5% of hospital revenue goes towards these so-called billing- and insurance-related expenses. Northern Light’s revenues, in the 2021-2022 fiscal year, were noted to be $2 billion, suggesting they may have spent around $170 million on billing- and insurance-related expense that year.

That same BMC article puts billing- and insurance-related expenses in the “single-payer” Medicare and Medicaid systems at about 3.1%. If Northern Light were operating in such a system, then they could have spent only $62 million on that expense, a savings of some $108 million (comparable to the projected $100 million savings with Optum).

Uncompensated care is another stress. I couldn’t find Northern Light’s figures for that, but according to the American Hospital Association, the cost to nonprofit hospitals of uncompensated care averages 13.9% of total expenses. If Northern Light’s total expenses approximate their revenues their uncompensated care would cost $278 million, an amount single-payer would eliminate.

Savings like these would certainly help with their $132 million operating losses. My figures may be off, and we don’t know what single-payer costs to hospitals might be, but I would hope Northern Light would study the single-payer approach, rather than just rely on a for-profit corporation.

Daniel C. Bryant, M.D.
former staff physician, Mercy Hospital
Cape Elizabeth

Related Headlines

Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.

Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.

filed under: