This is in response to Jim Fossel’s Sunday, Aug. 11 column, “‘Weird’ isn’t a pejorative term.”
Weird?
Jim Fossel is more concerned with Democrats using the word “weird” to describe Trump and Vance than he is the everyday rhetoric that resonates from Trump.
I’ve read enough of Mr. Fossel’s writing to understand that he is a staunch conservative. He writes that “Joe Biden’s judgment is always in doubt and his latest selection of Kamala Harris to replace him on the Democratic ticket is the latest example.” This, in my opinion, is categorically not true. I read articles written by individuals from both sides of the aisle in order to see the whole picture. I believe writers should try to stay away from painting themselves into a corner, as it results in the total bias of one side and loses credibility. Mr. Fossel failed to be credible.
Dan Arseneault
Sanford
Send questions/comments to the editors.
We invite you to add your comments, and we encourage a thoughtful, open and lively exchange of ideas and information on this website. By joining the conversation, you are agreeing to our commenting policy and terms of use. You can also read our FAQs. You can modify your screen name here.
Readers may now see a Top Comments tab, which is an experimental software feature to detect and highlight comments that demonstrate compassion, reasoning, personal stories and curiosity, and encourage and promote civil discourse.
Join the Conversation
Please sign into your Press Herald account to participate in conversations below. If you do not have an account, you can register or subscribe. Questions? Please see our FAQs.