
Reed & Reed, Inc. construction equipment sits idle at the Frank J. Wood Bridge between Brunswick and Topsham on Sept. 6, 2024. Paul Bagnall / The Times Record file photo
A federal judge last week rejected a challenge to the effort to replace the bridge linking downtown Brunswick and Topsham after years of costly legal battles.
The U.S. First Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston affirmed the U.S. District Court’s decision supporting the Maine Department of Transportation’s replacement of the Frank J. Wood Bridge. The decision, issued on Friday, Jan. 10, upholds a previous decision issued in January 2024 by U.S. District Judge Lance Walker ruling in favor of the Maine DOT.
The appeal was part of a years-long lawsuit filed in 2019 by the Friends of the Frank J. Wood Bridge, the National Trust for Historic Preservation and the Historic Bridge Foundation.
“This latest ruling reaffirms that the decision to replace the Frank J. Wood Bridge, rather than rehabilitate the existing structure, was and is the best way to continue to provide a safe and reliable connection between the villages of Brunswick and Topsham,” said Maine DOT Commissioner Bruce Van Note.
The replacement for the 90-plus-year-old structure, which carries Route 201 over the Androscoggin River between Brunswick and Topsham, began construction in April 2023. Steel beams are currently being placed on the new piers and abutments. All work associated with the construction contract awarded to Reed & Reed, Inc. of Woolwich for $49.9 million is scheduled for completion in late 2026.
Maine DOT began the process to improve the bridge crossing in 2014, but legal and process delays through a period of soaring construction costs caused by inflation caused the new bridge replacement to cost more than triple the original estimates.
“This is the eighth court ruling since 2020 that supports the new bridge decision made by the state and federal transportation officials after an extensive public and permitting process,” Van Note said.
The groups opposing the project could still appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, though it’s highly unlikely the court would consider the case. Of the roughly 8,000 cases it is asked to review each year, the Supreme Court only accepts about 100–150.
Maine DOT hopes the consistency of the prior legal rulings and support for the new bridge between Brunswick and Topsham will lead the plaintiffs to conclude that it is time to end this lengthy and expensive legal process, Van Note said.
The new bridge design is intended to last at least 100 years and will have sidewalks along both sides and bump-outs for pedestrian viewing of the river.
The Friends of the Frank J. Wood Bridge did not respond to requests for comment.
Send questions/comments to the editors.
Join the Conversation
We believe it’s important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It’s a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others. Read more...
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
For those stories that we do enable discussion, our system may hold up comments pending the approval of a moderator for several reasons, including possible violation of our guidelines. As the Maine Trust’s digital team reviews these comments, we ask for patience.
Comments are managed by our staff during regular business hours Monday through Friday and limited hours on Saturday and Sunday. Comments held for moderation outside of those hours may take longer to approve.
By joining the conversation, you are agreeing to our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is found on our FAQs.
You can modify your screen name here.
Show less
Join the Conversation
Please sign into your Press Herald account to participate in conversations below. If you do not have an account, you can register or subscribe. Questions? Please see our FAQs.