
President-elect Donald Trump and Melania Trump, walk off an Air Force Special Mission airplane as they arrive at Dulles International Airport on Saturday in Dulles, Va. Alex Brandon/Associated Press
From the moment he becomes the 47th president of the United States, Donald Trump will face a series of urgent fiscal deadlines and fractious policy debates — and his decisions beginning Monday will determine the trajectory of a strong but unpredictable U.S. economy.
The federal government is weeks away from running out of money, setting up another high-stakes funding fight in March. Its ability to borrow more is in jeopardy, too, as the country inches close to the limit known as the debt ceiling.
And trillions of dollars in tax cuts for families and businesses are scheduled to expire in December – “the single most important economic issue of the day,” as Scott Bessent, Trump’s nominee for treasury secretary, told lawmakers Thursday.
“If we do not renew and extend,” he said, “then we will be facing an economic calamity.”
As he returns to the Oval Office, Trump has pitched a radical shift: He seeks sharp reductions in federal spending, deeper tax cuts, seemingly universal tariffs and sweeping deregulation. But his foremost critics, particularly Democrats, see that agenda as weighted to the rich at the expense of the poor — and carrying the potential to severely worsen the fiscal health of a nation whose finances are already in stark decline.
“It sounds to me like you do believe that it’s fine to treat wealth more favorably,” Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Oregon), the top Democrat on the chamber’s tax panel, told Bessent during a roughly three-hour grilling that served to preview fierce battles ahead. “I couldn’t disagree more.”
The stakes became apparent even before Trump’s inauguration: On Friday, congressional budget analysts found that the gap between what Washington spends and collects reached $2 trillion last year, paving the way for the nation’s accumulated debt to top $52 trillion by 2035.
Against that dire fiscal backdrop, Trump and his top aides this weekend prepared for the well-choreographed chain of events in which Biden-era officials relinquish their posts and the new president’s allies take over key agencies, while their permanent replacements await Senate confirmation.
Trump has continued to fill key administration positions: On Friday, he announced the roster of his National Economic Council, which advises on everything from artificial intelligence to workers’ rights. At many agencies, however, it remains unclear who will take the reins on an acting basis before Cabinet officials are approved.
Trump is also eyeing about 100 executive actions he could announce as soon as Monday, including moves to impose historic tariffs, spur more oil and gas drilling, and fulfill his campaign pledge to deport millions of immigrants, according to two people with knowledge of the matter, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to reflect private deliberations.
To administer those tariffs, the president said he plans to stand up a new office — the External Revenue Service — though its exact design is unclear. Trump hopes to raise hundreds of billions of dollars from the universal duties, even as economists maintain that importers will mostly pass them along to consumers, raising prices while upsetting trillions of dollars in global commerce.
But Democratic critics have already started to assail Trump and his allies, raising alarm that his steepest cuts could decimate federal safety-net programs — including food stamps, low-income health insurance coverage under Medicaid and other forms of welfare. They point to analyses that show Trump’s universal tariff plans, meanwhile, could disproportionately hurt lower-income Americans.
“Republicans are surveying their members to see how much of Americans’ health care they’re willing to cut in exchange for tax cuts for billionaires,” said Lindsay Owens, executive director of the Groundwork Collaborative, a left-leaning think tank. “Trump hasn’t even been sworn in, and they’re already betraying their promises to the working class.”
The schisms were on full display beginning Wednesday, as the first wave of Trump’s nominees for key economic posts testified to the Senate. Each of the president-elect’s picks — Bessent, the nominee for treasury secretary; Russell Vought, the presumptive White House budget director; and Scott Turner, tapped to oversee federal housing programs — appeared to glide toward confirmation, even as they tussled with Democrats at times over their past records and divergent political views.
Repeatedly, the nominees emphasized the administration’s commitment to cost-cutting across the government, except defense, raising the odds that Trump’s cuts may predominantly fall on programs that offer college aid, combat climate change, protect workers and provide health insurance to the poor.
“We haven’t seen progress in the area of dealing with our fiscal situation, and that has to change, or that’s going to have profound impact on the next generation,” Vought told the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee on Wednesday.
The U.S. government is funded only into March, under a heavily contested deal — nearly scuttled by Trump’s billionaire ally Elon Musk — between House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-Louisiana, and outgoing Democratic leaders reached last year. Vought declined to offer specifics about the new budget he is preparing on Trump’s behalf, or the extent to which he would advise the incoming president to use a controversial authority, known as impoundment, to override lawmakers and cancel spending he opposes.
“The president has run on the issue of impoundment … and we’ll be developing our approach to this issue once his administration is in office,” Vought said.
Some Democratic lawmakers and legal experts believe such a move would be unconstitutional, and they repeatedly faulted Vought at his confirmation hearing for failing to offer specifics.
“You’re saying you’re just going to defy the courts … you are simply going to take the law into your own hands,” responded Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Connecticut, adding that he was “astonished and aghast” at the administration’s view.
As the parties haggle over spending, they also must confront a fast-approaching decision about the debt ceiling, which determines the maximum amount that the United States may borrow to pay for previously enacted spending. Late Friday, the outgoing Biden administration said it had started taking special accounting measures to free up cash to pay creditors and prevent a breach, buying more time for lawmakers to work with Trump on a deal that would avert a catastrophic default.
Anticipating a bitter debate, Trump tried but failed in the waning hours of last year to orchestrate a resolution to the debt ceiling so that it did not sap time and political bandwidth early in his term. He later endorsed repealing the concept altogether, in a move that surprised yet delighted Democrats who have long sought to abolish it.
But Bessent, the nominee for treasury secretary, signaled at his own confirmation hearing Thursday that the incoming administration might not be so quick to eliminate the borrowing cap: He initially told lawmakers last week he would order a “survey of market participants” on its implications, before saying he would follow Trump’s orders.
Throughout his testimony, Bessent sought to mount a vigorous defense of the broader Trump agenda, warning that millions of Americans could see a tax increase unless Congress extends key provisions from the 2017 law set to expire at the end of the year.
The tax law did lower rates for most income brackets, though analyses by the Tax Policy Center and other groups have found they primarily benefited the wealthiest earners and firms. Congress’s nonpartisan bookkeepers also found in November that allowing the tax cuts to expire would have a negligible effect on the nation’s economy, potentially blunting some GOP arguments like Bessent’s warning of a calamity. In fact, the Congressional Budget Office said, higher tax revenue could lead to greater private-sector investment by reducing federal debt.
Renewing the cuts is tricky because they could add to the nation’s debt even as Republicans insist that they are serious about reducing it.
The potentially sky-high price tag prompted some in the party to begin quietly circulating controversial ideas to pay for it. The early range of options — obtained by The Washington Post — includes more than $1 trillion in potential cuts to Medicaid, the health insurance program for the poor, as well as close to $800 billion from repealing tax credits meant to spur clean energy investments.
Other ideas on the list — such as cuts to scholarship benefits and scrapping of a deduction on mortgage interest claimed by homeowners — could prove politically explosive as well.
Meanwhile, Trump’s nominee to run the Department of Housing and Urban Development echoed familiar calls that the country must get its “fiscal house” in order. Turner, a former football player, signaled plans to streamline regulations and “maximize” the budget at HUD, but he offered few specifics about how cuts might affect the agency.
“HUD is failing at its most basic mission,” Turner told the Senate Banking Committee. “And that has to come to an end.”
Turner, who served in the first Trump administration as executive director of the White House Opportunity and Revitalization Council, is set to take charge during a national housing crisis and widespread affordability problems. Thursday’s hearing focused mostly on issues Democrats and Republicans agree on: There aren’t enough homes to go around. Rent is too expensive. Homeownership is out of reach for many. And homelessness is at record levels.
But lawmakers pressed Turner on some of the more divisive parts of Trump’s agenda. Sen. Bernie Moreno, R-Ohio, at one point, questioned whether undocumented immigration had contributed to the housing crunch, a nod to the president-elect’s claims during the campaign that migrants had worsened the shortage.
In response, Turner said having millions of people illegally enter the country poses “a great burden” on the economy, and that addressing immigration would help “take care of the American people.”
Send questions/comments to the editors.
We invite you to add your comments. We encourage a thoughtful exchange of ideas and information on this website. By joining the conversation, you are agreeing to our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is found on our FAQs. You can modify your screen name here.
Comments are managed by our staff during regular business hours Monday through Friday as well as limited hours on Saturday and Sunday. Comments held for moderation outside of those hours may take longer to approve.
Join the Conversation
Please sign into your Press Herald account to participate in conversations below. If you do not have an account, you can register or subscribe. Questions? Please see our FAQs.