You have an undefeated pitcher on the disabled list; you lost not one closer, but two, to injury; your cleanup hitter is one for his last 33; and you recently lost three of four to the perennial American League doormat Kansas City Royals. If you’re the Boston Red Sox, you’re also in first in your division by four games.
It’s hard not to lapse into pre- 2004 paroxysms of doubt and loathing with this team. They don’t appear to possess enough power hitting. Their platooning catchers don’t throw out a lot of base stealers. Of the 10 or so starters, the operative ace might be John Lackey, who’s coming off serious arm surgery and has a record barely scratching .500.
There’s no way this is one of the best teams in the American League.
And yet.
The selection of John Farrell as manager was a stroke of genius — though a year late — as he’s been able to properly manage the members of a pitching staff he helped create while eschewing the media hype that followed his predecessor around like the culinary remains of too much dugout beer and chicken.
The effort of those in uniform continues to impress. Shane Victorino is one of the best defensive outfielders in the game. Dustin Pedroia is the clubhouse motivator, leading by dirt-uniformed example. Will Middlebrooks is having a disappointing year, but at least he’s on the field, A-Rod.
Off the field … no more behavioral or steroid scandals and a new GM who has exceeded expectations filling in for Boy Wonder, also known as Theo Epstein.
Wednesday was the 19th time in 72 victories this season the Red Sox have won in their final at-bat, meaning more than a quarter of their wins have come at the last opportunity.
It was also the 28th comeback win of the year for the AL East-leading Red Sox, who have overcome deficits in seven of their past nine victories.
Here’s hoping for October baseball at Fenway.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less